Vivo Y300 Pro vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
The Vivo Y300 Pro (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads — 87/100 vs 55/100 (a 32-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) has the bigger battery (6800 mAh vs 6500); the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is faster in AnTuTu (3,950,082 vs 737,054); the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y300 Pro doesn't; the Vivo Y300 Pro is noticeably lighter (194g vs 224g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo Y300 Pro
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
What makes Vivo Y300 Pro better?
- Lighter: 194g vs 224g
- Better portability (66/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3950082 vs 737054
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 930
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2700
- Bigger battery: 6800 vs 6500 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 80W
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 52/100)
- Better camera (87/100 vs 37/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 66/100)
- Better display (81/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo Y300 Pro vs the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China), the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) scores 32 points higher (87/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads (98/100 vs 52/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads (87/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads (83/100 vs 66/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300 Pro (98/100 vs 52/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) and the Vivo Y300 Pro are nearly equal (81/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300 Pro (87/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) notably outperforms the Vivo Y300 Pro (83/100 vs 66/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y300 Pro notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) (66/100 vs 42/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo Y300 Pro | Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 737054 | 3950082 | |
| Geekbench Single | 930 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2700 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.9" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2392 | 1200x2608 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 6800 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 14, OriginOS 4 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | IP65 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 163.4×76.4×7.7 mm | 162.9×77.6×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 194 g | 224 g | |
| Launch price | — | $892 |
Camera comparison
Vivo Y300 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Front: 32MP
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Vivo Y300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2392
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
- 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1200x2608
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo Y300 Pro
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
- 6800 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo Y300 Pro and Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads Vivo Y300 Pro by 81.3% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo Y300 Pro
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300 Pro (98/100 vs 52/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) and the Vivo Y300 Pro are nearly equal (81/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300 Pro (87/100 vs 37/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) notably outperforms the Vivo Y300 Pro (83/100 vs 66/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y300 Pro notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) (66/100 vs 42/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo Y300 Pro or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo Y300 Pro by 32 points (87/100 vs 55/100).
What is the rating of the Vivo Y300 Pro and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?
The Vivo Y300 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 55/100, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo Y300 Pro or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads on camera score (87/100 vs 37/100).
Which is more powerful: the Vivo Y300 Pro or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads on performance (98/100 vs 52/100).
Should you choose the Vivo Y300 Pro over the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.