Vivo X300 vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Vivo X300 (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9300, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $499 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 78/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 2,555,121); the Vivo X300 is noticeably lighter (206g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably better than the Vivo X300 — the overall rating gap is 13 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo X300
Performance 83
Display 84
Camera 78
Battery 69
Portability 55
Value for money 82
Vivo X300 Ultra
Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94
What makes Vivo X300 better?
  • Lighter: 206g vs 230g
  • Cheaper at launch: $499 vs $950

  • Better portability (55/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 2555121
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 2142
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 7125
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 83/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 78/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 69/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 84/100)
  • Better value for money (94/100 vs 82/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Vivo X300 vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 13 points higher (91/100 vs 78/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 69/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (94/100 vs 82/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo X300 (99/100 vs 83/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo X300 (96/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo X300 (85/100 vs 69/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (55/100 vs 39/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 82/100).

Vivo X300: The Vivo X300 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Vivo X300 Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 2555121 4247433
Geekbench Single 2142 3640
Geekbench Multi 7125 11033
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 2800x1260 3168x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 80W 100W
Wireless charging 40W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 170
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 200 MP
Front camera 32 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP69
Dimensions 150.6×71.9×8.0 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 206 g 230 g
Launch price $499 $950
Camera comparison
Vivo X300
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Vivo X300
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2800x1260
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Vivo X300
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • Wireless: 40W
69
battery
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Vivo X300 and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Vivo X300 MediaTek Dimensity 9300
78/100
2555121 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +39.8%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Vivo X300 by 39.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo X300
$499
Vivo X300 Ultra
$950

Launch price difference: $451. Vivo X300 was $451 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo X300 (99/100 vs 83/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo X300 (96/100 vs 78/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo X300 (85/100 vs 69/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (55/100 vs 39/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (94/100 vs 82/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo X300 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably better than the Vivo X300 — the overall rating gap is 13 points.

What is the rating of the Vivo X300 and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 has a MobileRank rating of 78/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Vivo X300 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 78/100).

Which is more powerful: the Vivo X300 or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 83/100).

Should you choose the Vivo X300 over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.