Vivo X300 FE (Russia) vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra
The Vivo X300 FE (Russia) (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Gen 5, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 79/100 (a 10-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 FE (Russia) has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 6000); the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,600,724 vs 3,057,215); the Vivo X300 FE (Russia) is noticeably lighter (191g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo X300 FE (Russia)
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
What makes Vivo X300 FE (Russia) better?
- Bigger battery: 6500 vs 6000 mAh
- Lighter: 191g vs 226g
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 80/100)
- Better portability (64/100 vs 40/100)
What makes Xiaomi 17 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3600724 vs 3057215
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 2833
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 9119
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Higher performance (97/100 vs 90/100)
- Better camera (93/100 vs 64/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 85/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo X300 FE (Russia) vs the Xiaomi 17 Ultra, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra scores 10 points higher (89/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a bit better (97/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra and the Vivo X300 FE (Russia) are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo X300 FE (Russia) (93/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 FE (Russia) and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra are nearly equal (81/100 vs 80/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 FE (Russia) notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (64/100 vs 40/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo X300 FE (Russia) | Xiaomi 17 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8 Gen 5 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 3057215 | 3600724 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2833 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9119 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.3" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1216x2640 | 3200x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6500 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 166 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16, OriginOS 6 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 5000 nits | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 150.8×71.8×8.0 mm | 162.9×77.6×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 191 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $999 |
Camera comparison
Vivo X300 FE (Russia)
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.63
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Vivo X300 FE (Russia)
- 6.3" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1216x2640
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo X300 FE (Russia)
- 6500 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 16:09 hrs, total 33:23 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo X300 FE (Russia) and Xiaomi 17 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads Vivo X300 FE (Russia) by 15.1% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo X300 FE (Russia)
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a bit better (97/100 vs 90/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra and the Vivo X300 FE (Russia) are nearly equal (89/100 vs 85/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo X300 FE (Russia) (93/100 vs 64/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 FE (Russia) and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra are nearly equal (81/100 vs 80/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 FE (Russia) notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (64/100 vs 40/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo X300 FE (Russia) or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra is noticeably better than the Vivo X300 FE (Russia) — the overall rating gap is 10 points.
What is the rating of the Vivo X300 FE (Russia) and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 FE (Russia) has a MobileRank rating of 79/100, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo X300 FE (Russia) or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 64/100).
Which is more powerful: the Vivo X300 FE (Russia) or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads on performance (97/100 vs 90/100).
Should you choose the Vivo X300 FE (Russia) over the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 FE (Russia) is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.