Vivo X200 Pro vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
The Vivo X200 Pro (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9400, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $799 and $892. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads — 87/100 vs 82/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) has the bigger battery (6800 mAh vs 6000); the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is faster in AnTuTu (3,950,082 vs 2,825,187).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo X200 Pro
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
What makes Vivo X200 Pro better?
- Lighter: 223g vs 224g
- Cheaper at launch: $799 vs $892
- Better display (84/100 vs 81/100)
- Better portability (43/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3950082 vs 2825187
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 2866
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 9980
- Bigger battery: 6800 vs 6000 mAh
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 30W
- Higher performance (98/100 vs 90/100)
- Better camera (87/100 vs 84/100)
- Longer battery life (83/100 vs 76/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo X200 Pro vs the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China), the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) scores 5 points higher (87/100 vs 82/100). Value score: Vivo X200 Pro — 78/100, Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a bit better (98/100 vs 90/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Pro and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) and the Vivo X200 Pro are nearly equal (87/100 vs 84/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a bit better (83/100 vs 76/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X200 Pro and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) are nearly equal (43/100 vs 42/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo X200 Pro | Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 | Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 2825187 | 3950082 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2866 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9980 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | 6.9" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2800x1260 | 1200x2608 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 6800 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 / Funtouch OS 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 162.4×76.0×8.2 mm | 162.9×77.6×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 223 g | 224 g | |
| Launch price | $799 | $892 |
Camera comparison
Vivo X200 Pro
- Main: 50MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Vivo X200 Pro
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1260
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
- 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1200x2608
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo X200 Pro
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 12:47 hrs, total 24:55 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 30W
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
- 6800 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo X200 Pro and Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads Vivo X200 Pro by 28.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $93. Vivo X200 Pro was $93 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a bit better (98/100 vs 90/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X200 Pro and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) and the Vivo X200 Pro are nearly equal (87/100 vs 84/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a bit better (83/100 vs 76/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X200 Pro and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) are nearly equal (43/100 vs 42/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo X200 Pro or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) edges out the Vivo X200 Pro by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Vivo X200 Pro and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?
The Vivo X200 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 82/100, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) — 87/100.
Which is more powerful: the Vivo X200 Pro or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads on performance (98/100 vs 90/100).
Should you choose the Vivo X200 Pro over the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?
The Vivo X200 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.