Vivo X200 Pro Mini vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The Vivo X200 Pro Mini (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9400, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $750 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 82/100 (a 9-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5700); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 2,779,129); the Vivo X200 Pro Mini is noticeably lighter (189g vs 230g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes Vivo X200 Pro Mini better?
- Lighter: 189g vs 230g
- Cheaper at launch: $750 vs $950
- Better portability (63/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 2779129
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 2797
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 8767
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5700 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 30W
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 89/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 78/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 75/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 87/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo X200 Pro Mini vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 9 points higher (91/100 vs 82/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 75/100). Value score: Vivo X200 Pro Mini — 78/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 89/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Vivo X200 Pro Mini are nearly equal (89/100 vs 87/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Pro Mini (96/100 vs 78/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 75/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X200 Pro Mini notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (63/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo X200 Pro Mini | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 2779129 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2797 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 8767 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.3" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 2800x1260 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5700 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 90W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 30W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 4500 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 150.8×71.8×8.2 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | $750 | $950 |
Camera comparison
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
- Main: 50MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
- 6.3" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1260
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
- 5700 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 11:58 hrs, total 28:40 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 30W
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo X200 Pro Mini and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads Vivo X200 Pro Mini by 34.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $200. Vivo X200 Pro Mini was $200 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 89/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Vivo X200 Pro Mini are nearly equal (89/100 vs 87/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Pro Mini (96/100 vs 78/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 75/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X200 Pro Mini notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (63/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo X200 Pro Mini or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra edges out the Vivo X200 Pro Mini by just 9 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Vivo X200 Pro Mini and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Pro Mini has a MobileRank rating of 82/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo X200 Pro Mini or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 78/100).
Which is more powerful: the Vivo X200 Pro Mini or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 89/100).
Should you choose the Vivo X200 Pro Mini over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X200 Pro Mini is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.