Vivo iQOO 16 vs Vivo X200 Pro Mini
The Vivo iQOO 16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6, while the Vivo X200 Pro Mini (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9400; launch prices were $840 and $750. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads — 89/100 vs 82/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 16 has the bigger battery (8400 mAh vs 5700); the Vivo iQOO 16 is faster in AnTuTu (5,498,720 vs 2,779,129); the Vivo X200 Pro Mini is noticeably lighter (189g vs 223g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo iQOO 16
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
What makes Vivo iQOO 16 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 5498720 vs 2779129
- Better Geekbench Single: 4327 vs 2797
- Better Geekbench Multi: 12873 vs 8767
- Bigger battery: 8400 vs 5700 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 90W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz
- Faster wireless charging: 40W vs 30W
- Higher performance (100/100 vs 89/100)
- Longer battery life (90/100 vs 75/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 87/100)
What makes Vivo X200 Pro Mini better?
- Lighter: 189g vs 223g
- Cheaper at launch: $750 vs $840
- Better portability (63/100 vs 42/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo iQOO 16 vs the Vivo X200 Pro Mini, the Vivo iQOO 16 scores 7 points higher (89/100 vs 82/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (100/100 vs 89/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (90/100 vs 75/100). Value score: Vivo iQOO 16 — 92/100, Vivo X200 Pro Mini — 78/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (100/100 vs 89/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (99/100 vs 87/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 78/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Pro Mini (90/100 vs 75/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X200 Pro Mini notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 16 (63/100 vs 42/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo iQOO 16 | Vivo X200 Pro Mini | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 | MediaTek Dimensity 9400 | |
| AnTuTu | 5498720 | 2779129 | |
| Geekbench Single | 4327 | 2797 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 12873 | 8767 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.3" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1440x3168 | 2800x1260 | |
| Refresh rate | 165 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 8400 mAh | 5700 mAh | |
| Charging | 100W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 40W | 30W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 17 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 6000 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 163.8×76.9×8.3 mm | 150.8×71.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 223 g | 189 g | |
| Launch price | $840 | $750 |
Camera comparison
Vivo iQOO 16
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
- Main: 50MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Vivo iQOO 16
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
- 6.3" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2800x1260
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo iQOO 16
- 8400 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Vivo X200 Pro Mini
- 5700 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 11:58 hrs, total 28:40 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 30W
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo iQOO 16 and Vivo X200 Pro Mini, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 16 leads Vivo X200 Pro Mini by 97.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $90. Vivo X200 Pro Mini was $90 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (100/100 vs 89/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (99/100 vs 87/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 78/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 notably outperforms the Vivo X200 Pro Mini (90/100 vs 75/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X200 Pro Mini notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO 16 (63/100 vs 42/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo iQOO 16 or the Vivo X200 Pro Mini?
The Vivo iQOO 16 edges out the Vivo X200 Pro Mini by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO 16 and the Vivo X200 Pro Mini?
The Vivo iQOO 16 has a MobileRank rating of 89/100, the Vivo X200 Pro Mini — 82/100.
Which is more powerful: the Vivo iQOO 16 or the Vivo X200 Pro Mini?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on performance (100/100 vs 89/100).
Should you choose the Vivo iQOO 16 over the Vivo X200 Pro Mini?
The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Vivo X200 Pro Mini is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.