Vivo X100 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Vivo X100 Pro (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9300, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $700 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 79/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 5400); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 2,450,986); per DXOMark lab testing, the Vivo X300 Ultra has the stronger camera (170 vs 150).

The Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably better than the Vivo X100 Pro — the overall rating gap is 12 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo X100 Pro
Performance 83
Display 84
Camera 80
Battery 80
Portability 37
Value for money 70
Vivo X300 Ultra
Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94
What makes Vivo X100 Pro better?
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
  • Lighter: 221g vs 230g
  • Cheaper at launch: $700 vs $950

  • Overall rating 79/100
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 2450986
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 2142
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 7125
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 5400 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 83/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 80/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 80/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 84/100)
  • Better portability (39/100 vs 37/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Vivo X100 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 12 points higher (91/100 vs 79/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 80/100). Value score: Vivo X100 Pro — 70/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo X100 Pro (99/100 vs 83/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo X100 Pro (96/100 vs 80/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 80/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Vivo X100 Pro are nearly equal (39/100 vs 37/100).

Vivo X100 Pro: The Vivo X100 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Vivo X100 Pro Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 9300 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 2450986 4247433
Geekbench Single 2142 3640
Geekbench Multi 7125 11033
Display 6.8" LTPO AMOLED 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 2800x1260 3168x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5400 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 100W 100W
Wireless charging 50W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 150 170
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 64 MP 200 MP
Front camera 32 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 3000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP69
Dimensions 164.1×75.3×8.9 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 221 g 230 g
Launch price $700 $950
Camera comparison
Vivo X100 Pro
  • Main: 50MP f/1.57
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 64MP
  • Front: 32MP
80
camera
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Vivo X100 Pro
  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2800x1260
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Vivo X100 Pro
  • 5400 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 50W
80
battery
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Vivo X100 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Vivo X100 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9300
79/100
2450986 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +42.3%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Vivo X100 Pro by 42.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo X100 Pro
$700
Vivo X300 Ultra
$950

Launch price difference: $250. Vivo X100 Pro was $250 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo X100 Pro (99/100 vs 83/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo X100 Pro (96/100 vs 80/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (85/100 vs 80/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra and the Vivo X100 Pro are nearly equal (39/100 vs 37/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo X100 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably better than the Vivo X100 Pro — the overall rating gap is 12 points.

What is the rating of the Vivo X100 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X100 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 79/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Vivo X100 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 80/100).

Which is more powerful: the Vivo X100 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 83/100).

Should you choose the Vivo X100 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X100 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.