Vivo X Fold6 vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition

The Vivo X Fold6 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500, while the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X Fold6 leads — 88/100 vs 71/100 (a 17-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X Fold6 has the bigger battery (6900 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 64 MP; the Vivo X Fold6 is faster in AnTuTu (3,485,039 vs 1,290,942); the Vivo X Fold6 is thinner (4.3mm vs 8.4mm).

The Vivo X Fold6 is noticeably better than the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition — the overall rating gap is 17 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo X Fold6
Performance 94
Display 81
Camera 87
Battery 82
Portability 100
Value for money 80
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
Performance 69
Display 80
Camera 86
Battery 56
Portability 52
Value for money
What makes Vivo X Fold6 better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3485039 vs 1290942
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3228 vs 1675
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9553 vs 4453
  • Bigger battery: 6900 vs 5000 mAh
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP

  • Higher performance (94/100 vs 69/100)
  • Better camera (87/100 vs 86/100)
  • Longer battery life (82/100 vs 56/100)
  • Better display (81/100 vs 80/100)
  • Better portability (100/100 vs 52/100)
What makes ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition better?

  • Overall rating 71/100
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Vivo X Fold6 vs the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, the Vivo X Fold6 scores 17 points higher (88/100 vs 71/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (94/100 vs 69/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (82/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (94/100 vs 69/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X Fold6 and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition are nearly equal (81/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition are nearly equal (87/100 vs 86/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (82/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (100/100 vs 52/100).

Vivo X Fold6: The Vivo X Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition: The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Specs comparison
Specification Vivo X Fold6 ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 9500 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
AnTuTu 3485039 1290942
Geekbench Single 3228 1675
Geekbench Multi 9553 4453
Display 8.0" LTPO AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 2480x2200 1116x2480
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6900 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 80W 80W
Wireless charging 50W 0W
Main camera 200 MP 64 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 64 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 64 MP
Front camera 20 MP 16 MP
RAM 16GB 12GB / 18GB
Storage 512GB 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 Android 12, MyOS 12
Brightness (peak) 5500 nits 1500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68
Dimensions 159.7×142.3×4.3 mm 163.3×73.6×8.4 mm
Weight 204 g
Price $1900
Camera comparison
Vivo X Fold6
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.75
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 20MP
87
camera
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
  • Main: 64MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 64MP
  • Telephoto: 64MP
  • Front: 16MP
86
camera
Display comparison
Vivo X Fold6
  • 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2480x2200
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1116x2480
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display
Battery and charging
Vivo X Fold6
  • 6900 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • Wireless: 50W
82
battery
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
56
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Vivo X Fold6 and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Vivo X Fold6 MediaTek Dimensity 9500
88/100
3485039 AnTuTu
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
71/100 -170.0%
1290942 AnTuTu

Vivo X Fold6 leads ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition by 170.0% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Price and availability
Vivo X Fold6
$1900
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
Price unknown
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (94/100 vs 69/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X Fold6 and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition are nearly equal (81/100 vs 80/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition are nearly equal (87/100 vs 86/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (82/100 vs 56/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (100/100 vs 52/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo X Fold6 or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The Vivo X Fold6 is noticeably better than the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition — the overall rating gap is 17 points.

What is the rating of the Vivo X Fold6 and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The Vivo X Fold6 has a MobileRank rating of 88/100, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition — 71/100.

Which is more powerful: the Vivo X Fold6 or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The Vivo X Fold6 leads on performance (94/100 vs 69/100).

Should you choose the Vivo X Fold6 over the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The Vivo X Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.