vivo X Fold+ vs Vivo X300 Ultra
The vivo X Fold+ (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 65/100 (a 26-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4730); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,420,808); the Vivo X300 Ultra is noticeably lighter (230g vs 311g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
vivo X Fold+
Vivo X300 Ultra
What makes vivo X Fold+ better?
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 40W
- Better portability (52/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1420808
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1761
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 4688
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4730 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 80W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 230g vs 311g
- Higher performance (99/100 vs 71/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 55/100)
- Longer battery life (85/100 vs 65/100)
- Better display (89/100 vs 77/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the vivo X Fold+ vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 26 points higher (91/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 71/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 55/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 65/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the vivo X Fold+ (99/100 vs 71/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 77/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the vivo X Fold+ (96/100 vs 55/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the vivo X Fold+ (85/100 vs 65/100). In the "portability" category, the vivo X Fold+ is a bit better (52/100 vs 39/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | vivo X Fold+ | Vivo X300 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1420808 | 4247433 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1761 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4688 | 11047 | |
| Display | 8.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" LTPO OLED | |
| Resolution | 1916x2160 | 3168x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4730 mAh | 7000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 50W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 170 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 48 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 8 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 12, Origin OS Ocean | Android 16 | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 162.0×144.9×6.3 mm | 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 311 g | 230 g | |
| Launch price | — | $950 |
Camera comparison
vivo X Fold+
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 48MP
- Telephoto: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Vivo X300 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
vivo X Fold+
- 8.0" Foldable LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1916x2160
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 3168x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
vivo X Fold+
- 4730 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Vivo X300 Ultra
- 7000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared vivo X Fold+ and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Ultra leads vivo X Fold+ by 66.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
vivo X Fold+
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the vivo X Fold+ (99/100 vs 71/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 77/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the vivo X Fold+ (96/100 vs 55/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra notably outperforms the vivo X Fold+ (85/100 vs 65/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the vivo X Fold+ is a bit better (52/100 vs 39/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the vivo X Fold+ or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the vivo X Fold+ by 26 points (91/100 vs 65/100).
What is the rating of the vivo X Fold+ and the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The vivo X Fold+ has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.
Which has the better camera: the vivo X Fold+ or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 55/100).
Which is more powerful: the vivo X Fold+ or the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 71/100).
Should you choose the vivo X Fold+ over the Vivo X300 Ultra?
The vivo X Fold+ is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.