Vivo S50 vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition

The Vivo S50 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3, while the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo S50 leads — 72/100 vs 71/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo S50 has the bigger battery (6500 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 64 MP; the Vivo S50 is faster in AnTuTu (1,794,400 vs 1,294,871).

The Vivo S50 edges out the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Vivo S50

Performance 75
Display 85
Camera 64
Battery 68
Portability 66
Value for money 74

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition

Performance 68
Display 80
Camera 86
Battery 56
Portability 52
Value for money —

What makes Vivo S50 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 1794400 vs 1294871
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1923 vs 1662
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 5179 vs 4188
  • Bigger battery: 6500 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 80W
  • Lighter: 196g vs 204g

  • Higher performance (75/100 vs 68/100)
  • Longer battery life (68/100 vs 56/100)
  • Better display (85/100 vs 80/100)
  • Better portability (66/100 vs 52/100)

What makes ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition better?

  • Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP

  • Better camera (86/100 vs 64/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Vivo S50 vs the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, the Vivo S50 scores 1 points higher (72/100 vs 71/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads (86/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo S50 leads (68/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo S50 is a bit better (75/100 vs 68/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo S50 is a bit better (85/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition notably outperforms the Vivo S50 (86/100 vs 64/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo S50 is a bit better (68/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo S50 is a bit better (66/100 vs 52/100).

Vivo S50: The Vivo S50 is a better fit for active users.
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition: The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.

Specs comparison

Specification Vivo S50 ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
AnTuTu 1794400 1294871
Geekbench Single 1923 1662
Geekbench Multi 5179 4188
Display 6.6" AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1260x2750 1116x2480
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 6500 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 90W 80W
Main camera 50 MP 64 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 64 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 64 MP
Front camera 50 MP 16 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 18GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 Android 12, MyOS 12
Brightness (peak) — 1500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68/IP69 —
Dimensions 157.5×74.3×7.6 mm 163.3×73.6×8.4 mm
Weight 196 g 204 g
Launch price $390 —

Camera comparison

Vivo S50

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
64
camera

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition

  • Main: 64MP f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 64MP
  • Telephoto: 64MP
  • Front: 16MP
86
camera

Display comparison

Vivo S50

  • 6.6" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2750
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
85
display

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1116x2480
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display

Battery and charging

Vivo S50

  • 6500 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • No wireless charging
68
battery

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
56
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Vivo S50 and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Vivo S50 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3
72/100
1794400 AnTuTu
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
71/100 -38.6%
1294871 AnTuTu

Vivo S50 leads ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition by 38.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Vivo S50

$390

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition

Price unknown

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo S50 is a bit better (75/100 vs 68/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo S50 is a bit better (85/100 vs 80/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition notably outperforms the Vivo S50 (86/100 vs 64/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo S50 is a bit better (68/100 vs 56/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo S50 is a bit better (66/100 vs 52/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Vivo S50 or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The Vivo S50 edges out the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Vivo S50 and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The Vivo S50 has a MobileRank rating of 72/100, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition — 71/100.

Which has the better camera: the Vivo S50 or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition leads on camera score (86/100 vs 64/100).

Which is more powerful: the Vivo S50 or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The Vivo S50 leads on performance (75/100 vs 68/100).

Should you choose the Vivo S50 over the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition?

The Vivo S50 is a better fit for active users. The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Space Edition is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.