Vivo S16e vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Vivo S16e (2022) runs on the Exynos 1080, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 87/100 vs 49/100 (a 38-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 4600); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo S16e is noticeably lighter (187g vs 226g).
Vivo S16e
Vivo X300 Pro
- Lighter: 187g vs 226g
- Better portability (70/100 vs 43/100)
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 4600 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 66W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Better camera (96/100 vs 32/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 44/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 80/100)
Comparing the Vivo S16e vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 38 points higher (87/100 vs 49/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 44/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Vivo S16e are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo S16e (96/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo S16e (81/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo S16e notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (70/100 vs 43/100).
| Specification | Vivo S16e | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Exynos 1080 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 3269794 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4600 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 11, Origin OS Ocean | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1300 nits | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 162.5×75.8×7.7 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 187 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Vivo S16e
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo S16e
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo S16e
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Vivo S16e
Price unknowndisplay
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro and the Vivo S16e are nearly equal (84/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo S16e (96/100 vs 32/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo S16e (81/100 vs 44/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo S16e notably outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (70/100 vs 43/100).
Which is better: the Vivo S16e or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo S16e by 38 points (87/100 vs 49/100).
What is the rating of the Vivo S16e and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo S16e has a MobileRank rating of 49/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 87/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo S16e or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 32/100).
Should you choose the Vivo S16e over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo S16e is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.