Vivo S16 Pro vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Vivo S16 Pro (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8200, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 57/100 (a 34-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4600); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 1,221,748); the Vivo S16 Pro is noticeably lighter (182g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo S16 Pro by 34 points (91/100 vs 57/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo S16 Pro
Performance 62
Display 79
Camera 44
Battery 44
Portability 76
Value for money
Vivo X300 Ultra
Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94
What makes Vivo S16 Pro better?
  • Lighter: 182g vs 230g

  • Better portability (76/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 1221748
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1230
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 3297
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4600 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 66W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 62/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 44/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 44/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Vivo S16 Pro vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 34 points higher (91/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 62/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 44/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo S16 Pro (99/100 vs 62/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo S16 Pro (96/100 vs 44/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo S16 Pro (85/100 vs 44/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo S16 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (76/100 vs 39/100).

Vivo S16 Pro: The Vivo S16 Pro is a better fit for active users.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Vivo S16 Pro Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 8200 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 1221748 4247433
Geekbench Single 1230 3640
Geekbench Multi 3297 11033
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 1080x2400 3168x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4600 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 66W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 170
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 50 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 13, Origin OS 3 Android 16
NFC yes yes
Protection IP69
Dimensions 164.1×74.8×7.4 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 182 g 230 g
Launch price $950
Camera comparison
Vivo S16 Pro
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 50MP
44
camera
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Vivo S16 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Vivo S16 Pro
  • 4600 mAh
  • Wired: 66W
  • No wireless charging
44
battery
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Vivo S16 Pro and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Vivo S16 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 8200
57/100
1221748 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +71.2%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Vivo S16 Pro by 71.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo S16 Pro
Price unknown
Vivo X300 Ultra
$950
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo S16 Pro (99/100 vs 62/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 79/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo S16 Pro (96/100 vs 44/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo S16 Pro (85/100 vs 44/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo S16 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (76/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo S16 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo S16 Pro by 34 points (91/100 vs 57/100).

What is the rating of the Vivo S16 Pro and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo S16 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 57/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Vivo S16 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 44/100).

Which is more powerful: the Vivo S16 Pro or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 62/100).

Should you choose the Vivo S16 Pro over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo S16 Pro is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.