Vivo iQOO U6 vs Vivo Y32t
The Vivo iQOO U6 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 700, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO U6 leads — 33/100 vs 28/100 (a 5-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO U6 is faster in AnTuTu (515,647 vs 303,398).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo iQOO U6
Vivo Y32t
What makes Vivo iQOO U6 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 515647 vs 303398
- Better Geekbench Single: 690 vs 341
- Better Geekbench Multi: 1736 vs 779
- Higher performance (40/100 vs 20/100)
What makes Vivo Y32t better?
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 43/100)
- Better portability (68/100 vs 54/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo iQOO U6 vs the Vivo Y32t, the Vivo iQOO U6 scores 5 points higher (33/100 vs 28/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO U6 leads (40/100 vs 20/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO U6 notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (40/100 vs 20/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 39/100. In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (68/100 vs 54/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo iQOO U6 | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 700 | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 515647 | 303398 | |
| Geekbench Single | 690 | 341 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1736 | 779 | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | — | — | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | — | |
| Main camera | 13 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB / 8GB | — | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Dimensions | 164.1×75.6×8.2 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | — | 179 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Vivo iQOO U6
- Main: 13MP f/2.2
- Front: 5MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Display comparison
Vivo iQOO U6
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Vivo iQOO U6
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo iQOO U6 and Vivo Y32t, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO U6 leads Vivo Y32t by 70.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO U6 notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (40/100 vs 20/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 39/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 10/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (52/100 vs 43/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y32t is a bit better (68/100 vs 54/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo iQOO U6 or the Vivo Y32t?
The Vivo iQOO U6 edges out the Vivo Y32t by just 5 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO U6 and the Vivo Y32t?
The Vivo iQOO U6 has a MobileRank rating of 33/100, the Vivo Y32t — 28/100.
Which is more powerful: the Vivo iQOO U6 or the Vivo Y32t?
The Vivo iQOO U6 leads on performance (40/100 vs 20/100).
Should you choose the Vivo iQOO U6 over the Vivo Y32t?
Neither model stands out enough to recommend it for a specific use case: the clearest difference is performance — better on the Vivo iQOO U6 (40/100 vs 20/100).