Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro vs Vivo Y200 (Asia)
The Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7200, while the Vivo Y200 (Asia) (2024) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y200 (Asia) leads — 34/100 vs 33/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y200 (Asia) has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4600); the main camera is 64 MP vs 50 MP.
Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
Vivo Y200 (Asia)
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 175g vs 188g
- Better design/ergonomics (81/100 vs 65/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4600 mAh
- Faster charging: 80W vs 66W
- Longer battery life (51/100 vs 37/100)
Comparing the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro vs the Vivo Y200 (Asia), the Vivo Y200 (Asia) scores 1 points higher (34/100 vs 33/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y200 (Asia) leads (51/100 vs 37/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 37/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y200 (Asia) is a bit better (51/100 vs 37/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo Y200 (Asia) (81/100 vs 65/100). In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
| Specification | Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro | Vivo Y200 (Asia) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7200 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 4 Gen 2 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 560863 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 923 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 2249 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.7" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4600 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 66W | 80W | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 13, planned upgrade to Android 14, Funtouch 14 | Android 14, Funtouch 14 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1300 nits | 1800 nits | |
| NFC | no | no | |
| Protection | — | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 164.1×74.8×7.4 mm | 163.2×75.9×7.8 mm | |
| Weight | 175 g | 188 g | |
| Price | — | — |
Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 16MP
Vivo Y200 (Asia)
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 32MP
Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y200 (Asia)
- 6.7" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro
- 4600 mAh
- Wired: 66W
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y200 (Asia)
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 37/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y200 (Asia) is a bit better (51/100 vs 37/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro notably outperforms the Vivo Y200 (Asia) (81/100 vs 65/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, both devices are on the same level — 55/100.
Which is better: the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro or the Vivo Y200 (Asia)?
The Vivo Y200 (Asia) edges out the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro and the Vivo Y200 (Asia)?
The Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 33/100, the Vivo Y200 (Asia) — 34/100.
Should you choose the Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro over the Vivo Y200 (Asia)?
The Vivo iQOO Z7 Pro is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo Y200 (Asia) is a better fit for everyday use.