Vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

The Vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro (2023) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9200+, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads — 87/100 vs 64/100 (a 23-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) has the bigger battery (6800 mAh vs 5000); the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 1,811,490); the Vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro is noticeably lighter (192g vs 224g).

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro by 23 points (87/100 vs 64/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro
Performance 74
Display 94
Camera 35
Battery 64
Portability 59
Value for money
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
Performance 98
Display 81
Camera 87
Battery 83
Portability 42
Value for money 86
What makes Vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro better?
  • Faster charging: 120W vs 90W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 192g vs 224g

  • Better display (94/100 vs 81/100)
  • Better portability (59/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 1811490
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1917
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 4509
  • Bigger battery: 6800 vs 5000 mAh

  • Higher performance (98/100 vs 74/100)
  • Better camera (87/100 vs 35/100)
  • Longer battery life (83/100 vs 64/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro vs the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China), the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) scores 23 points higher (87/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads (98/100 vs 74/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads (87/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads (83/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro (98/100 vs 74/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro (87/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro (83/100 vs 64/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) (59/100 vs 42/100).

Vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro: The Vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro is a better fit for active users.
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China): The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 9200+ Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 1811490 3942923
Geekbench Single 1917 3640
Geekbench Multi 4509 11033
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1260x2800 1200x2608
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 6800 mAh
Charging 120W 90W
Wireless charging 0W 50W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 16 MP 50 MP
RAM 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 13, Funtouch 13 or OriginOS 3 (China) Android 16
Brightness (peak) 1300 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68/IP69
Dimensions 164.7×77.0×8.5 mm 162.9×77.6×8.3 mm
Weight 192 g 224 g
Launch price $892
Camera comparison
Vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
35
camera
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 50MP
87
camera
Display comparison
Vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1260x2800
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
94
display
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
  • 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1200x2608
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display
Battery and charging
Vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • No wireless charging
64
battery
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
  • 6800 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 50W
83
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro and Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro MediaTek Dimensity 9200+
64/100
1811490 AnTuTu
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
87/100 +54.1%
3942923 AnTuTu

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads Vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro by 54.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro
Price unknown
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
$892
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro (98/100 vs 74/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro is a bit better (94/100 vs 81/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro (87/100 vs 35/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro (83/100 vs 64/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) (59/100 vs 42/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro by 23 points (87/100 vs 64/100).

What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 64/100, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) — 87/100.

Which has the better camera: the Vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads on camera score (87/100 vs 35/100).

Which is more powerful: the Vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads on performance (98/100 vs 74/100).

Should you choose the Vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro over the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Vivo iQOO Neo8 Pro is a better fit for active users. The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.