Vivo iQOO Neo 855 vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

The Vivo iQOO Neo 855 (2019) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 855, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads — 87/100 vs 45/100 (a 42-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) has the bigger battery (6800 mAh vs 4500); the main camera is 12 MP vs 50 MP; the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is faster in AnTuTu (3,950,082 vs 824,513); the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo iQOO Neo 855 doesn't; the Vivo iQOO Neo 855 is noticeably lighter (198g vs 224g).

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 855 by 42 points (87/100 vs 45/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Vivo iQOO Neo 855

Performance 54
Display 83
Camera 13
Battery 35
Portability 59
Value for money —

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

Performance 98
Display 81
Camera 87
Battery 83
Portability 42
Value for money 88

What makes Vivo iQOO Neo 855 better?

  • Lighter: 198g vs 224g

  • Better display (83/100 vs 81/100)
  • Better portability (59/100 vs 42/100)

What makes Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3950082 vs 824513
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 968
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 2731
  • Bigger battery: 6800 vs 4500 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 33W
  • Better main camera: 50MP vs 12MP

  • Higher performance (98/100 vs 54/100)
  • Better camera (87/100 vs 13/100)
  • Longer battery life (83/100 vs 35/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Vivo iQOO Neo 855 vs the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China), the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) scores 42 points higher (87/100 vs 45/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads (98/100 vs 54/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads (87/100 vs 13/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads (83/100 vs 35/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 855 (98/100 vs 54/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 855 and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) are nearly equal (83/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 855 (87/100 vs 13/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 855 (83/100 vs 35/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 855 notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) (59/100 vs 42/100).

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China): The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Vivo iQOO Neo 855 Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 824513 3950082
Geekbench Single 968 3639
Geekbench Multi 2731 11047
Display 6.4" Super AMOLED 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2340 1200x2608
Refresh rate — 120 Hz
Battery 4500 mAh 6800 mAh
Charging 33W 90W
Wireless charging 0W 50W
Main camera 12 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 16 MP 50 MP
RAM 6GB / 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 64GB / 128GB / 256GB 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 9.0 (Pie); Funtouch 9 Android 16
NFC no yes
Protection — IP68/IP69
Dimensions 159.5×75.2×8.1 mm 162.9×77.6×8.3 mm
Weight 198 g 224 g
Launch price — $892

Camera comparison

Vivo iQOO Neo 855

  • Main: 12MP f/1.8
  • Front: 16MP
13
camera

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

  • Main: 50MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 50MP
87
camera

Display comparison

Vivo iQOO Neo 855

  • 6.4" Super AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2340
  • Refresh rate: —
83
display

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

  • 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1200x2608
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display

Battery and charging

Vivo iQOO Neo 855

  • 4500 mAh
  • Wired: 33W
  • No wireless charging
35
battery

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

  • 6800 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 50W
83
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Vivo iQOO Neo 855 and Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Vivo iQOO Neo 855 Qualcomm Snapdragon 855
45/100
824513 AnTuTu
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
87/100 +79.1%
3950082 AnTuTu

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads Vivo iQOO Neo 855 by 79.1% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Vivo iQOO Neo 855

Price unknown

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

$892

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 855 (98/100 vs 54/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 855 and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) are nearly equal (83/100 vs 81/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 855 (87/100 vs 13/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 855 (83/100 vs 35/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 855 notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) (59/100 vs 42/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Vivo iQOO Neo 855 or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 855 by 42 points (87/100 vs 45/100).

What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO Neo 855 and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Vivo iQOO Neo 855 has a MobileRank rating of 45/100, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) — 87/100.

Which has the better camera: the Vivo iQOO Neo 855 or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads on camera score (87/100 vs 13/100).

Which is more powerful: the Vivo iQOO Neo 855 or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads on performance (98/100 vs 54/100).

Should you choose the Vivo iQOO Neo 855 over the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.