Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

The Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8200, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads — 87/100 vs 59/100 (a 28-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) has the bigger battery (6800 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 64 MP vs 50 MP; the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is faster in AnTuTu (3,950,082 vs 1,240,821); the Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE is noticeably lighter (193g vs 224g).

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE by 28 points (87/100 vs 59/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE

Performance 64
Display 79
Camera 40
Battery 64
Portability 57
Value for money —

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

Performance 98
Display 81
Camera 87
Battery 83
Portability 42
Value for money 88

What makes Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE better?

  • Faster charging: 120W vs 90W
  • Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
  • Lighter: 193g vs 224g

  • Better portability (57/100 vs 42/100)

What makes Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3950082 vs 1240821
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1239
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 3962
  • Bigger battery: 6800 vs 5000 mAh

  • Higher performance (98/100 vs 64/100)
  • Better camera (87/100 vs 40/100)
  • Longer battery life (83/100 vs 64/100)
  • Better display (81/100 vs 79/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE vs the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China), the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) scores 28 points higher (87/100 vs 59/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads (98/100 vs 64/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads (87/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads (83/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE (98/100 vs 64/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) and the Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE are nearly equal (81/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE (87/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE (83/100 vs 64/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) (57/100 vs 42/100).

Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE: The Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE is a better fit for active users.
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China): The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 8200 Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 1240821 3950082
Geekbench Single 1239 3639
Geekbench Multi 3962 11047
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2400 1200x2608
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 6800 mAh
Charging 120W 90W
Wireless charging 0W 50W
Main camera 64 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 16 MP 50 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB / 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB / 512GB 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 13 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 1300 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection — IP68/IP69
Dimensions 164.8×76.9×8.6 mm 162.9×77.6×8.3 mm
Weight 193 g 224 g
Launch price — $892

Camera comparison

Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE

  • Main: 64MP f/1.8
  • Front: 16MP
40
camera

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

  • Main: 50MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 50MP
87
camera

Display comparison

Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

  • 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1200x2608
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display

Battery and charging

Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • No wireless charging
64
battery

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

  • 6800 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 50W
83
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE and Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE MediaTek Dimensity 8200
59/100
1240821 AnTuTu
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
87/100 +68.6%
3950082 AnTuTu

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE by 68.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE

Price unknown

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

$892

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE (98/100 vs 64/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) and the Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE are nearly equal (81/100 vs 79/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE (87/100 vs 40/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE (83/100 vs 64/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) (57/100 vs 42/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE by 28 points (87/100 vs 59/100).

What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE has a MobileRank rating of 59/100, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) — 87/100.

Which has the better camera: the Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads on camera score (87/100 vs 40/100).

Which is more powerful: the Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads on performance (98/100 vs 64/100).

Should you choose the Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE over the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Vivo iQOO Neo 7 SE is a better fit for active users. The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.