Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) vs ZTE Axon 40
The Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, while the ZTE Axon 40 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 leads — 58/100 vs 57/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Axon 40 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4700); the ZTE Axon 40 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) doesn't.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global)
ZTE Axon 40
What makes Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) better?
- Lighter: 190g vs 200g
- Better display (80/100 vs 73/100)
- Better portability (59/100 vs 53/100)
What makes ZTE Axon 40 better?
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4700 mAh
- Better camera (51/100 vs 43/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 50/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) vs the ZTE Axon 40, the ZTE Axon 40 scores 1 points higher (58/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 61/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) is a bit better (80/100 vs 73/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 is a bit better (51/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 and the Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) are nearly equal (52/100 vs 50/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) is a bit better (59/100 vs 53/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) | ZTE Axon 40 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 | |
| AnTuTu | 1010069 | 1010069 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1298 | 1298 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3520 | 3520 | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 6.7" | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | — | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 44 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | — | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 12 Snow Cone | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1300 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Dimensions | 163.0×76.2×8.5 mm | 163.4×75.9×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 190 g | 200 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Camera comparison
Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global)
- Main: 64MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
ZTE Axon 40
- Main: 64MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 44MP
Display comparison
Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global)
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 40
- 6.7"
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global)
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 40
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) and ZTE Axon 40, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 61/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) is a bit better (80/100 vs 73/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 is a bit better (51/100 vs 43/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 and the Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) are nearly equal (52/100 vs 50/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) is a bit better (59/100 vs 53/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) or the ZTE Axon 40?
The ZTE Axon 40 edges out the Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) and the ZTE Axon 40?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) has a MobileRank rating of 57/100, the ZTE Axon 40 — 58/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) or the ZTE Axon 40?
The ZTE Axon 40 leads on camera score (51/100 vs 43/100).
Should you choose the Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) over the ZTE Axon 40?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) is a better fit for active users. The ZTE Axon 40 is a better fit for active users.