Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) vs ZTE Axon 40
The Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, while the ZTE Axon 40 (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 leads — 58/100 vs 57/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Axon 40 has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4700); the ZTE Axon 40 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) doesn't.
Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global)
ZTE Axon 40
- Lighter: 190g vs 200g
- Better display (80/100 vs 73/100)
- Better portability (59/100 vs 53/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4700 mAh
- Better camera (51/100 vs 43/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 50/100)
Comparing the Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) vs the ZTE Axon 40, the ZTE Axon 40 scores 1 points higher (58/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 61/100. In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) is a bit better (80/100 vs 73/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 is a bit better (51/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 and the Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) are nearly equal (52/100 vs 50/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) is a bit better (59/100 vs 53/100).
| Specification | Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) | ZTE Axon 40 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G | Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 | |
| AnTuTu | 1010069 | 1010069 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1298 | 1298 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 3520 | 3520 | |
| Display | 6.6" AMOLED | 6.7" | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4700 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 80W | — | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 44 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | — | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 128GB | |
| OS | Android 12, Funtouch 12 | Android 12 Snow Cone | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1300 nits | — | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Dimensions | 163.0×76.2×8.5 mm | 163.4×75.9×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 190 g | 200 g | |
| Launch price | — | — |
Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global)
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
ZTE Axon 40
- Main: 64MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 44MP
Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global)
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
ZTE Axon 40
- 6.7"
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global)
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
ZTE Axon 40
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
We compared Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) and ZTE Axon 40, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Equal performance based on benchmark results.
performance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 61/100.
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) is a bit better (80/100 vs 73/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 is a bit better (51/100 vs 43/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 and the Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) are nearly equal (52/100 vs 50/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) is a bit better (59/100 vs 53/100).
Which is better: the Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) or the ZTE Axon 40?
The ZTE Axon 40 edges out the Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) and the ZTE Axon 40?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) has a MobileRank rating of 57/100, the ZTE Axon 40 — 58/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) or the ZTE Axon 40?
The ZTE Axon 40 leads on camera score (51/100 vs 43/100).
Should you choose the Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) over the ZTE Axon 40?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) is a better fit for active users. The ZTE Axon 40 is a better fit for active users.