Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra

The Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G, while the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra leads — 71/100 vs 57/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4700); the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (1,290,942 vs 1,010,069); the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) doesn't.

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is noticeably better than the Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) — the overall rating gap is 14 points.
Profile comparison
Category scores
Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global)
Performance 61
Display 80
Camera 43
Battery 50
Portability 59
Value for money
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Performance 69
Display 80
Camera 86
Battery 52
Portability 52
Value for money
What makes Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) better?
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 65W
  • Lighter: 190g vs 204g

  • Better portability (59/100 vs 52/100)
What makes ZTE Axon 40 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 1290942 vs 1010069
  • Better Geekbench Single: 1675 vs 1298
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 4453 vs 3520
  • Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4700 mAh

  • Higher performance (69/100 vs 61/100)
  • Better camera (86/100 vs 43/100)
  • Longer battery life (52/100 vs 50/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) vs the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra scores 14 points higher (71/100 vs 57/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra leads (86/100 vs 43/100). In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is a bit better (69/100 vs 61/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 80/100. In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) (86/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra and the Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) are nearly equal (52/100 vs 50/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) is a bit better (59/100 vs 52/100).

Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global): The Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) is a better fit for active users.
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra: The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Specs comparison
Specification Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
AnTuTu 1010069 1290942
Geekbench Single 1298 1675
Geekbench Multi 3520 4453
Display 6.6" AMOLED 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2400 1116x2480
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4700 mAh 5000 mAh
Charging 80W 65W
Main camera 64 MP 64 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 64 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 64 MP
Front camera 16 MP 16 MP
RAM 8GB / 12GB 8GB / 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 128GB / 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 12, Funtouch 12 Android 12, MyOS 12
Brightness (peak) 1300 nits 1500 nits
NFC no yes
Dimensions 163.0×76.2×8.5 mm 163.3×73.6×8.4 mm
Weight 190 g 204 g
Launch price
Camera comparison
Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global)
  • Main: 64MP f/f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
43
camera
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
  • Main: 64MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 64MP
  • Telephoto: 64MP
  • Front: 16MP
86
camera
Display comparison
Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global)
  • 6.6" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1116x2480
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display
Battery and charging
Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global)
  • 4700 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
50
battery
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 65W
  • No wireless charging
52
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) and ZTE Axon 40 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) Qualcomm Snapdragon 870 5G
57/100
1010069 AnTuTu
ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
71/100 +21.8%
1290942 AnTuTu

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra leads Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) by 21.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is a bit better (69/100 vs 61/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 80/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) (86/100 vs 43/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra and the Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) are nearly equal (52/100 vs 50/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) is a bit better (59/100 vs 52/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra?

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is noticeably better than the Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) — the overall rating gap is 14 points.

What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) and the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) has a MobileRank rating of 57/100, the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra — 71/100.

Which has the better camera: the Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra?

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra leads on camera score (86/100 vs 43/100).

Which is more powerful: the Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) or the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra?

The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra leads on performance (69/100 vs 61/100).

Should you choose the Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) over the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO Neo 6 (Global) is a better fit for active users. The ZTE Axon 40 Ultra is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.