Vivo iQOO Neo 11 vs ZTE Blade A52 Lite
Comparing the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (2025) and the ZTE Blade A52 Lite (2022) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads — 76/100 vs 27/100 (a 49-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 has the bigger battery (7500 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 50 MP vs 13 MP; the ZTE Blade A52 Lite is noticeably lighter (188g vs 210g).
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
ZTE Blade A52 Lite
- Bigger battery: 7500 vs 4000 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 13MP
- Better camera (35/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (92/100 vs 32/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 39/100)
- Lighter: 188g vs 210g
- Better portability (60/100 vs 49/100)
Comparing the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 vs the ZTE Blade A52 Lite, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 scores 49 points higher (76/100 vs 27/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads (35/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads (92/100 vs 32/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A52 Lite (99/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 notably outperforms the ZTE Blade A52 Lite (35/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A52 Lite (92/100 vs 32/100). In the "portability" category, the ZTE Blade A52 Lite is a bit better (60/100 vs 49/100).
| Specification | Vivo iQOO Neo 11 | ZTE Blade A52 Lite | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | — | |
| AnTuTu | 3154662 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 3041 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9494 | — | |
| Display | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | 6.5" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 1440x3168 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 7500 mAh | 4000 mAh | |
| Charging | 120W | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 16 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 2GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 32GB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 11 (Go edition) | |
| NFC | — | no | |
| Dimensions | — | 164.8×75.9×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 210 g | 188 g | |
| Launch price | $400 | — |
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
ZTE Blade A52 Lite
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 5MP
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
ZTE Blade A52 Lite
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
- 7500 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- Wireless charging: no data
ZTE Blade A52 Lite
- 4000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
ZTE Blade A52 Lite
Price unknowndisplay
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A52 Lite (99/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 notably outperforms the ZTE Blade A52 Lite (35/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A52 Lite (92/100 vs 32/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the ZTE Blade A52 Lite is a bit better (60/100 vs 49/100).
Which is better: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 or the ZTE Blade A52 Lite?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A52 Lite by 49 points (76/100 vs 27/100).
What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 and the ZTE Blade A52 Lite?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 has a MobileRank rating of 76/100, the ZTE Blade A52 Lite — 27/100.
Which has the better camera: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 or the ZTE Blade A52 Lite?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads on camera score (35/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 over the ZTE Blade A52 Lite?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The ZTE Blade A52 Lite is a better fit for everyday use.