Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra vs Xiaomi 13 Pro

The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500M, while the Xiaomi 13 Pro (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2; launch prices were $548 and $790. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads — 75/100 vs 74/100 (a 1-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra has the bigger battery (9100 mAh vs 4820); the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,579,952 vs 1,770,620).

The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra edges out the Xiaomi 13 Pro by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra

Performance 95
Display 99
Camera 35
Battery 80
Portability 38
Value for money 68

Xiaomi 13 Pro

Performance 76
Display 90
Camera 70
Battery 76
Portability 37
Value for money 62

What makes Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3579952 vs 1770620
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 2004
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 5311
  • Bigger battery: 9100 vs 4820 mAh
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 225g vs 229g
  • Cheaper at launch: $548 vs $790

  • Higher performance (95/100 vs 76/100)
  • Longer battery life (80/100 vs 76/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 90/100)
  • Better portability (38/100 vs 37/100)

What makes Xiaomi 13 Pro better?

  • Faster charging: 120W vs 100W

  • Better camera (70/100 vs 35/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra vs the Xiaomi 13 Pro, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra scores 1 points higher (75/100 vs 74/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads (95/100 vs 76/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 13 Pro leads (70/100 vs 35/100). Value score: Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra — 68/100, Xiaomi 13 Pro — 62/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi 13 Pro (95/100 vs 76/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 90/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 13 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (70/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra and the Xiaomi 13 Pro are nearly equal (80/100 vs 76/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra and the Xiaomi 13 Pro are nearly equal (38/100 vs 37/100).

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra: The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life.
Xiaomi 13 Pro: The Xiaomi 13 Pro is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life.

Specs comparison

Specification Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra Xiaomi 13 Pro
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 9500M Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
AnTuTu 3579952 1770620
Geekbench Single 3293 2004
Geekbench Multi 10243 5311
Display 6.8" LTPS AMOLED 6.7" AMOLED
Resolution 1440x3200 3200x1440
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 9100 mAh 4820 mAh
Charging 100W 120W
Wireless charging 0W 50W
DXOMark (camera) — 136
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 8 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 16 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 8GB / 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 128GB / 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 16 / OriginOS 6 Android 13
Brightness (peak) 4500 nits 1900 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68/IP69 IP68
Dimensions 163.4×75.9×8.6 mm 162.9×74.6×8.4 mm
Weight 225 g 229 g
Launch price $548 $790

Camera comparison

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.88
  • Ultrawide: 8MP
  • Front: 16MP
35
camera

Xiaomi 13 Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
70
camera

Display comparison

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPS AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3200
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display

Xiaomi 13 Pro

  • 6.7" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 3200x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
90
display

Battery and charging

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra

  • 9100 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • No wireless charging
80
battery

Xiaomi 13 Pro

  • 4820 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • Wireless: 50W
76
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra and Xiaomi 13 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra MediaTek Dimensity 9500M
75/100
3579952 AnTuTu
Xiaomi 13 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
74/100 -102.2%
1770620 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads Xiaomi 13 Pro by 102.2% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra

$548

Xiaomi 13 Pro

$790

Launch price difference: $242. Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra was $242 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra notably outperforms the Xiaomi 13 Pro (95/100 vs 76/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a bit better (99/100 vs 90/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 13 Pro significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra (70/100 vs 35/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra and the Xiaomi 13 Pro are nearly equal (80/100 vs 76/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra and the Xiaomi 13 Pro are nearly equal (38/100 vs 37/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra or the Xiaomi 13 Pro?

The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra edges out the Xiaomi 13 Pro by just 1 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra and the Xiaomi 13 Pro?

The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 75/100, the Xiaomi 13 Pro — 74/100.

Which has the better camera: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra or the Xiaomi 13 Pro?

The Xiaomi 13 Pro leads on camera score (70/100 vs 35/100).

Which is more powerful: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra or the Xiaomi 13 Pro?

The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra leads on performance (95/100 vs 76/100).

Should you choose the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra over the Xiaomi 13 Pro?

The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life. The Xiaomi 13 Pro is a better fit for active users, those who care about battery life.