Vivo iQOO 12 Pro vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra

The Vivo iQOO 12 Pro (2023) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $810 and $999. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 82/100 (a 7-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5100); the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,600,724 vs 2,433,337); the Vivo iQOO 12 Pro is noticeably lighter (205g vs 226g).

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra edges out the Vivo iQOO 12 Pro by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Vivo iQOO 12 Pro

Performance 83
Display 99
Camera 79
Battery 82
Portability 50
Value for money 78

Xiaomi 17 Ultra

Performance 97
Display 89
Camera 93
Battery 80
Portability 40
Value for money 88

What makes Vivo iQOO 12 Pro better?

  • Faster charging: 120W vs 90W
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 205g vs 226g
  • Cheaper at launch: $810 vs $999

  • Longer battery life (82/100 vs 80/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 89/100)
  • Better portability (50/100 vs 40/100)

What makes Xiaomi 17 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3600724 vs 2433337
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 2203
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 6511
  • Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5100 mAh

  • Higher performance (97/100 vs 83/100)
  • Better camera (93/100 vs 79/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Vivo iQOO 12 Pro vs the Xiaomi 17 Ultra, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra scores 7 points higher (89/100 vs 82/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (97/100 vs 83/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 79/100). Value score: Vivo iQOO 12 Pro — 78/100, Xiaomi 17 Ultra — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a bit better (97/100 vs 83/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 12 Pro is a bit better (99/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a bit better (93/100 vs 79/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 12 Pro and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra are nearly equal (82/100 vs 80/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 12 Pro is a bit better (50/100 vs 40/100).

Vivo iQOO 12 Pro: The Vivo iQOO 12 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Xiaomi 17 Ultra: The Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Vivo iQOO 12 Pro Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 2433337 3600724
Geekbench Single 2203 3639
Geekbench Multi 6511 11047
Display 6.8" LTPO AMOLED 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1440x3200 3200x1440
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5100 mAh 6000 mAh
Charging 120W 90W
Wireless charging 50W 50W
DXOMark (camera) — 166
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 64 MP 200 MP
Front camera 16 MP 32 MP
RAM 16GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 14 (International), OriginOS 4 (China) Android 16
Brightness (peak) 3000 nits 3500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 164.6×75.4×8.6 mm 162.9×77.6×8.3 mm
Weight 205 g 226 g
Launch price $810 $999

Camera comparison

Vivo iQOO 12 Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 64MP
  • Front: 16MP
79
camera

Xiaomi 17 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.63
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
93
camera

Display comparison

Vivo iQOO 12 Pro

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3200
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
99
display

Xiaomi 17 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 3200x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display

Battery and charging

Vivo iQOO 12 Pro

  • 5100 mAh
  • Wired: 120W
  • Wireless: 50W
82
battery

Xiaomi 17 Ultra

  • 6000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 16:09 hrs, total 33:23 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 50W
80
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Vivo iQOO 12 Pro and Xiaomi 17 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Vivo iQOO 12 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3
82/100
2433337 AnTuTu
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
89/100 +32.4%
3600724 AnTuTu

Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads Vivo iQOO 12 Pro by 32.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Vivo iQOO 12 Pro

$810

Xiaomi 17 Ultra

$999

Launch price difference: $189. Vivo iQOO 12 Pro was $189 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a bit better (97/100 vs 83/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 12 Pro is a bit better (99/100 vs 89/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a bit better (93/100 vs 79/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 12 Pro and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra are nearly equal (82/100 vs 80/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 12 Pro is a bit better (50/100 vs 40/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Vivo iQOO 12 Pro or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra edges out the Vivo iQOO 12 Pro by just 7 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.

What is the rating of the Vivo iQOO 12 Pro and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 12 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 82/100, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the Vivo iQOO 12 Pro or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 79/100).

Which is more powerful: the Vivo iQOO 12 Pro or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads on performance (97/100 vs 83/100).

Should you choose the Vivo iQOO 12 Pro over the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?

The Vivo iQOO 12 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.