Tecno Pova Neo 2 vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Tecno Pova Neo 2 (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio G85, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 30/100 (a 58-point difference). Key differences: the Tecno Pova Neo 2 has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 6510); the main camera is 16 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,326,259 vs 348,562); the Vivo X300 Pro is thinner (8.0mm vs 9.6mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Pova Neo 2
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Tecno Pova Neo 2 better?
- Bigger battery: 7000 vs 6510 mAh
- Overall rating 30/100
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3326259 vs 348562
- Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 419
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 1461
- Faster charging: 90W vs 18W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 16MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (94/100 vs 29/100)
- Better camera (96/100 vs 12/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 55/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 43/100)
- Better portability (43/100 vs 20/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Pova Neo 2 vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 58 points higher (88/100 vs 30/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (94/100 vs 29/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 12/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Neo 2 (94/100 vs 29/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Neo 2 (84/100 vs 43/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Neo 2 (96/100 vs 12/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Neo 2 (81/100 vs 55/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Neo 2 (43/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Pova Neo 2 | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G85 | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | 348562 | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | 419 | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 1461 | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1640 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 90 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 7000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | 18W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 16 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB / 6GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 12, HIOS 8.6 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 170.9×77.8×9.6 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | — | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Camera comparison
Tecno Pova Neo 2
- Main: 16MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Tecno Pova Neo 2
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1640
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Pova Neo 2
- 7000 mAh
- Wired: 18W
- No wireless charging
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Tecno Pova Neo 2 and Vivo X300 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo X300 Pro leads Tecno Pova Neo 2 by 89.5% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Tecno Pova Neo 2
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Neo 2 (94/100 vs 29/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Neo 2 (84/100 vs 43/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Neo 2 (96/100 vs 12/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Neo 2 (81/100 vs 55/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X300 Pro notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Neo 2 (43/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Pova Neo 2 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Neo 2 by 58 points (88/100 vs 30/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Pova Neo 2 and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Tecno Pova Neo 2 has a MobileRank rating of 30/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Pova Neo 2 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 12/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Pova Neo 2 or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on performance (94/100 vs 29/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Pova Neo 2 over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.