Tecno Pova Curve vs Xiaomi 15 Ultra
The Tecno Pova Curve (2025) runs on the Dimensity 7300 Ultimate, while the Xiaomi 15 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite; launch prices were $219 and $999. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 15 Ultra leads — 85/100 vs 58/100 (a 27-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 15 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5500); the main camera is 64 MP vs 50 MP; the Xiaomi 15 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,030,376 vs 877,641); the Tecno Pova Curve is noticeably lighter (189g vs 225g).
Tecno Pova Curve
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
- Better main camera: 64MP vs 50MP
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 189g vs 225g
- Cheaper at launch: $219 vs $999
- Better portability (70/100 vs 29/100)
- Higher AnTuTu: 3030376 vs 877641
- Better Geekbench Single: 3050 vs 1011
- Better Geekbench Multi: 10200 vs 2813
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5500 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 45W
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (87/100 vs 39/100)
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 64/100)
- Better display (90/100 vs 89/100)
- Better value for money (82/100 vs 76/100)
Comparing the Tecno Pova Curve vs the Xiaomi 15 Ultra, the Xiaomi 15 Ultra scores 27 points higher (85/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 15 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 15 Ultra leads (87/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 15 Ultra leads (80/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (92/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 15 Ultra and the Tecno Pova Curve are nearly equal (90/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (87/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (80/100 vs 64/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova Curve significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 15 Ultra (70/100 vs 29/100). In the "value for money" category, the Xiaomi 15 Ultra is a bit better (82/100 vs 76/100).
| Specification | Tecno Pova Curve | Xiaomi 15 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Dimensity 7300 Ultimate | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 877641 | 3030376 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1011 | 3050 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2813 | 10200 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.7" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2436 | 3200x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5500 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 159 | |
| Main camera | 64 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 13 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 6GB / 8GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 / HyperOS 2 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1300 nits | 3200 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP64 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 164.3×74.6×7.5 mm | 161.3×75.3×9.4 mm | |
| Weight | 189 g | 225 g | |
| Launch price | $219 | $999 |
Tecno Pova Curve
- Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 13MP
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.63
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Tecno Pova Curve
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2436
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
- 6.7" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Tecno Pova Curve
- 5500 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless charging: no data
Xiaomi 15 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 12:19 hrs, total 30:03 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 50W
We compared Tecno Pova Curve and Xiaomi 15 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Xiaomi 15 Ultra leads Tecno Pova Curve by 71.0% in our overall performance rating.
Launch price difference: $780. Tecno Pova Curve was $780 cheaper at launch.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (92/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 15 Ultra and the Tecno Pova Curve are nearly equal (90/100 vs 89/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (87/100 vs 39/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 15 Ultra notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (80/100 vs 64/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova Curve significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 15 Ultra (70/100 vs 29/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Xiaomi 15 Ultra is a bit better (82/100 vs 76/100).
Which is better: the Tecno Pova Curve or the Xiaomi 15 Ultra?
The Xiaomi 15 Ultra significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve by 27 points (85/100 vs 58/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Pova Curve and the Xiaomi 15 Ultra?
The Tecno Pova Curve has a MobileRank rating of 58/100, the Xiaomi 15 Ultra — 85/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Pova Curve or the Xiaomi 15 Ultra?
The Xiaomi 15 Ultra leads on camera score (87/100 vs 39/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Pova Curve or the Xiaomi 15 Ultra?
The Xiaomi 15 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Pova Curve over the Xiaomi 15 Ultra?
The Tecno Pova Curve is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi 15 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.