Tecno Pova Curve vs Xiaomi 17 Max

The Tecno Pova Curve (2025) runs on the Dimensity 7300 Ultimate, while the Xiaomi 17 Max (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $219 and $799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Max leads — 88/100 vs 58/100 (a 30-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 Max has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 5500); the main camera is 64 MP vs 200 MP; the Xiaomi 17 Max is faster in AnTuTu (3,654,776 vs 877,641); the Tecno Pova Curve is noticeably lighter (189g vs 219g).

The Xiaomi 17 Max significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve by 30 points (88/100 vs 58/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Pova Curve
Performance 55
Display 89
Camera 39
Battery 64
Portability 70
Value for money 76
Xiaomi 17 Max
Performance 97
Display 81
Camera 90
Battery 90
Portability 40
Value for money 88
What makes Tecno Pova Curve better?
  • Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
  • Lighter: 189g vs 219g
  • Cheaper at launch: $219 vs $799

  • Better display (89/100 vs 81/100)
  • Better portability (70/100 vs 40/100)
What makes Xiaomi 17 Max better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3654776 vs 877641
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1011
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 2813
  • Bigger battery: 8000 vs 5500 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP

  • Higher performance (97/100 vs 55/100)
  • Better camera (90/100 vs 39/100)
  • Longer battery life (90/100 vs 64/100)
  • Higher value score: 88/100 vs 76/100
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Tecno Pova Curve vs the Xiaomi 17 Max, the Xiaomi 17 Max scores 30 points higher (88/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Max leads (97/100 vs 55/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Max leads (90/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Max leads (90/100 vs 64/100). In the "value for money" category, the Xiaomi 17 Max leads (88/100 vs 76/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Max significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (97/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova Curve is a bit better (89/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Max significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (90/100 vs 39/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Max notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (90/100 vs 64/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova Curve significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Max (70/100 vs 40/100). In the "value for money" category, the Xiaomi 17 Max is a bit better (88/100 vs 76/100).

Tecno Pova Curve: The Tecno Pova Curve is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.
Xiaomi 17 Max: The Xiaomi 17 Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Tecno Pova Curve Xiaomi 17 Max
Processor Dimensity 7300 Ultimate Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 877641 3654776
Geekbench Single 1011 3640
Geekbench Multi 2813 11033
Display 6.8" AMOLED 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2436 2608x1200
Refresh rate 144 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5500 mAh 8000 mAh
Charging 45W 100W
Wireless charging 50W
Main camera 64 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 13 MP 32 MP
RAM 6GB / 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 15 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 1300 nits 3500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP64 IP68
Dimensions 164.3×74.6×7.5 mm
Weight 189 g 219 g
Launch price $219 $799
Camera comparison
Tecno Pova Curve
  • Main: 64MP f/f/1.8
  • Front: 13MP
39
camera
Xiaomi 17 Max
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
90
camera
Display comparison
Tecno Pova Curve
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2436
  • Refresh rate: 144 Hz
89
display
Xiaomi 17 Max
  • 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2608x1200
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display
Battery and charging
Tecno Pova Curve
  • 5500 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • Wireless charging: no data
64
battery
Xiaomi 17 Max
  • 8000 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 50W
90
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Tecno Pova Curve and Xiaomi 17 Max, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Tecno Pova Curve Dimensity 7300 Ultimate
58/100
877641 AnTuTu
Xiaomi 17 Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
88/100 +76.0%
3654776 AnTuTu

Xiaomi 17 Max leads Tecno Pova Curve by 76.0% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Tecno Pova Curve
$219
Xiaomi 17 Max
$799

Launch price difference: $580. Tecno Pova Curve was $580 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Max significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (97/100 vs 55/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Tecno Pova Curve is a bit better (89/100 vs 81/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Max significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (90/100 vs 39/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Max notably outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve (90/100 vs 64/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova Curve significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Max (70/100 vs 40/100).

value for money

In the "value for money" category, the Xiaomi 17 Max is a bit better (88/100 vs 76/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Pova Curve or the Xiaomi 17 Max?

The Xiaomi 17 Max significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova Curve by 30 points (88/100 vs 58/100).

What is the rating of the Tecno Pova Curve and the Xiaomi 17 Max?

The Tecno Pova Curve has a MobileRank rating of 58/100, the Xiaomi 17 Max — 88/100.

Which has the better camera: the Tecno Pova Curve or the Xiaomi 17 Max?

The Xiaomi 17 Max leads on camera score (90/100 vs 39/100).

Which is more powerful: the Tecno Pova Curve or the Xiaomi 17 Max?

The Xiaomi 17 Max leads on performance (97/100 vs 55/100).

Should you choose the Tecno Pova Curve over the Xiaomi 17 Max?

The Tecno Pova Curve is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers. The Xiaomi 17 Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.