Tecno Pova 6 Pro vs Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
The Tecno Pova 6 Pro (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6080, while the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9400+; launch prices were $250 and $280. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads — 71/100 vs 53/100 (a 18-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 6000); the main camera is 108 MP vs 50 MP; the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ is faster in AnTuTu (2,786,169 vs 573,460).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Pova 6 Pro
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
What makes Tecno Pova 6 Pro better?
- Better main camera: 108MP vs 50MP
- Lighter: 198g vs 212g
- Cheaper at launch: $250 vs $280
- Better camera (46/100 vs 35/100)
- Better portability (61/100 vs 50/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2786169 vs 573460
- Better Geekbench Single: 2729 vs 750
- Better Geekbench Multi: 8430 vs 2020
- Bigger battery: 8000 vs 6000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 70W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Higher performance (88/100 vs 44/100)
- Longer battery life (73/100 vs 61/100)
- Better display (94/100 vs 79/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Pova 6 Pro vs the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ scores 18 points higher (71/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads (88/100 vs 44/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Pova 6 Pro leads (46/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads (73/100 vs 61/100). Value score: Tecno Pova 6 Pro — 56/100, Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 6 Pro (88/100 vs 44/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ notably outperforms the Tecno Pova 6 Pro (94/100 vs 79/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Pova 6 Pro is a bit better (46/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ is a bit better (73/100 vs 61/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova 6 Pro is a bit better (61/100 vs 50/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Pova 6 Pro | Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 6080 | MediaTek Dimensity 9400+ | |
| AnTuTu | 573460 | 2786169 | |
| Geekbench Single | 750 | 2729 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2020 | 8430 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2436 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 8000 mAh | |
| Charging | 70W | 90W | |
| Main camera | 108 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 32 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 1300 nits | 5500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP53 | IP65 | |
| Dimensions | 165.5×76.1×7.9 mm | 163.7×75.9×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 198 g | 212 g | |
| Launch price | $250 | $280 |
Camera comparison
Tecno Pova 6 Pro
- Main: 108MP f/1.9
- Front: 32MP
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Tecno Pova 6 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2436
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Pova 6 Pro
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 70W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+
- 8000 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Tecno Pova 6 Pro and Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads Tecno Pova 6 Pro by 79.4% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $30. Tecno Pova 6 Pro was $30 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 6 Pro (88/100 vs 44/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ notably outperforms the Tecno Pova 6 Pro (94/100 vs 79/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Tecno Pova 6 Pro is a bit better (46/100 vs 35/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ is a bit better (73/100 vs 61/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pova 6 Pro is a bit better (61/100 vs 50/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Pova 6 Pro or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?
The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ is noticeably better than the Tecno Pova 6 Pro — the overall rating gap is 18 points.
What is the rating of the Tecno Pova 6 Pro and the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?
The Tecno Pova 6 Pro has a MobileRank rating of 53/100, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ — 71/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Pova 6 Pro or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?
The Tecno Pova 6 Pro leads on camera score (46/100 vs 35/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Pova 6 Pro or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?
The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ leads on performance (88/100 vs 44/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Pova 6 Pro over the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+?
The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo+ is a better fit for gamers and power users, budget-conscious buyers.