Tecno Pova 5 vs Vivo iQOO Neo 11
The Tecno Pova 5 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99, while the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads — 76/100 vs 50/100 (a 26-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 has the bigger battery (7500 mAh vs 6000); the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 is faster in AnTuTu (3,154,662 vs 552,286).
Tecno Pova 5
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
- Overall rating 50/100
- Higher AnTuTu: 3154662 vs 552286
- Better Geekbench Single: 3041 vs 727
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9494 vs 2047
- Bigger battery: 7500 vs 6000 mAh
- Faster charging: 120W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 144Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 210g vs 219g
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 43/100)
- Longer battery life (92/100 vs 56/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 66/100)
- Better portability (49/100 vs 36/100)
Comparing the Tecno Pova 5 vs the Vivo iQOO Neo 11, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 scores 26 points higher (76/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads (92/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads (92/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 5 (92/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 5 (99/100 vs 66/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 5 (92/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 is a bit better (49/100 vs 36/100).
| Specification | Tecno Pova 5 | Vivo iQOO Neo 11 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Helio G99 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | |
| AnTuTu | 552286 | 3154662 | |
| Geekbench Single | 727 | 3041 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2047 | 9494 | |
| Display | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2460 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 6000 mAh | 7500 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 120W | |
| Main camera | — | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 13, HIOS 13 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 580 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | — | |
| Dimensions | 168.6×76.6×9.0 mm | — | |
| Weight | 219 g | 210 g | |
| Launch price | — | $400 |
Tecno Pova 5
- Main: —
- Front: 8MP
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Tecno Pova 5
- 6.8" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2460
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Tecno Pova 5
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Neo 11
- 7500 mAh
- Wired: 120W
- Wireless charging: no data
We compared Tecno Pova 5 and Vivo iQOO Neo 11, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads Tecno Pova 5 by 82.5% in our overall performance rating.
Tecno Pova 5
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 5 (92/100 vs 43/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 5 (99/100 vs 66/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 5 (92/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 is a bit better (49/100 vs 36/100).
Which is better: the Tecno Pova 5 or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 5 by 26 points (76/100 vs 50/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Pova 5 and the Vivo iQOO Neo 11?
The Tecno Pova 5 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Vivo iQOO Neo 11 — 76/100.
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Pova 5 or the Vivo iQOO Neo 11?
The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 leads on performance (92/100 vs 43/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Pova 5 over the Vivo iQOO Neo 11?
The Tecno Pova 5 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo iQOO Neo 11 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.