Tecno Pova 5 vs Vivo iQOO 16

The Tecno Pova 5 (2023) runs on the MediaTek Helio G99, while the Vivo iQOO 16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads — 89/100 vs 50/100 (a 39-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 16 has the bigger battery (8400 mAh vs 6000); the Vivo iQOO 16 is faster in AnTuTu (5,498,720 vs 554,590).

The Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 5 by 39 points (89/100 vs 50/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Tecno Pova 5

Performance 43
Display 66
Camera —
Battery 56
Portability 36
Value for money —

Vivo iQOO 16

Performance 100
Display 99
Camera 78
Battery 90
Portability 42
Value for money 92

What makes Tecno Pova 5 better?

  • Lighter: 219g vs 223g

  • Overall rating 50/100

What makes Vivo iQOO 16 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 5498720 vs 554590
  • Better Geekbench Single: 4327 vs 727
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 12873 vs 2047
  • Bigger battery: 8400 vs 6000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
  • Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 120Hz

  • Higher performance (100/100 vs 43/100)
  • Longer battery life (90/100 vs 56/100)
  • Better display (99/100 vs 66/100)
  • Better portability (42/100 vs 36/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Tecno Pova 5 vs the Vivo iQOO 16, the Vivo iQOO 16 scores 39 points higher (89/100 vs 50/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (100/100 vs 43/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (90/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 5 (100/100 vs 43/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 5 (99/100 vs 66/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 5 (90/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (42/100 vs 36/100).

Vivo iQOO 16: The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Tecno Pova 5 Vivo iQOO 16
Processor MediaTek Helio G99 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6
AnTuTu 554590 5498720
Geekbench Single 727 4327
Geekbench Multi 2047 12873
Display 6.8" IPS LCD 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2460 1440x3168
Refresh rate 120 Hz 165 Hz
Battery 6000 mAh 8400 mAh
Charging 45W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
Main camera — 50 MP
Ultrawide 0 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 8 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 13, HIOS 13 Android 17
Brightness (peak) 580 nits 6000 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection — IP68/IP69
Dimensions 168.6×76.6×9.0 mm 163.8×76.9×8.3 mm
Weight 219 g 223 g
Launch price — $840

Camera comparison

Tecno Pova 5

  • Main: —
  • Front: 8MP
—
camera

Vivo iQOO 16

  • Main: 50MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
78
camera

Display comparison

Tecno Pova 5

  • 6.8" IPS LCD
  • Resolution: 1080x2460
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
66
display

Vivo iQOO 16

  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1440x3168
  • Refresh rate: 165 Hz
99
display

Battery and charging

Tecno Pova 5

  • 6000 mAh
  • Wired: 45W
  • No wireless charging
56
battery

Vivo iQOO 16

  • 8400 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
90
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Tecno Pova 5 and Vivo iQOO 16, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Tecno Pova 5 MediaTek Helio G99
50/100
554590 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO 16 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6
89/100 +89.9%
5498720 AnTuTu

Vivo iQOO 16 leads Tecno Pova 5 by 89.9% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Tecno Pova 5

Price unknown

Vivo iQOO 16

$840

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 5 (100/100 vs 43/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 5 (99/100 vs 66/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 5 (90/100 vs 56/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (42/100 vs 36/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Tecno Pova 5 or the Vivo iQOO 16?

The Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Tecno Pova 5 by 39 points (89/100 vs 50/100).

What is the rating of the Tecno Pova 5 and the Vivo iQOO 16?

The Tecno Pova 5 has a MobileRank rating of 50/100, the Vivo iQOO 16 — 89/100.

Which is more powerful: the Tecno Pova 5 or the Vivo iQOO 16?

The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on performance (100/100 vs 43/100).

Should you choose the Tecno Pova 5 over the Vivo iQOO 16?

The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.