Tecno Pop 5X vs ZTE Blade A75 4G
The Tecno Pop 5X (2022) runs on the Unisoc, while the ZTE Blade A75 4G (2024) runs on the Unisoc T606. By overall MobileRank rating, the ZTE Blade A75 4G leads — 25/100 vs 9/100 (a 16-point difference). Key differences: the ZTE Blade A75 4G has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 8 MP vs 50 MP; the ZTE Blade A75 4G has NFC for contactless payments, the Tecno Pop 5X doesn't; the Tecno Pop 5X is noticeably lighter (150g vs 189g).
Tecno Pop 5X
ZTE Blade A75 4G
- Lighter: 150g vs 189g
- Better design/ergonomics (100/100 vs 63/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4000 mAh
- Better main camera: 50MP vs 8MP
- Better camera (24/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (36/100 vs 12/100)
- Better display (50/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 55/100)
Comparing the Tecno Pop 5X vs the ZTE Blade A75 4G, the ZTE Blade A75 4G scores 16 points higher (25/100 vs 9/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Blade A75 4G leads (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Blade A75 4G leads (36/100 vs 12/100). In the "value for money" category, the ZTE Blade A75 4G leads (100/100 vs 55/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, the ZTE Blade A75 4G significantly outperforms the Tecno Pop 5X (50/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the ZTE Blade A75 4G notably outperforms the Tecno Pop 5X (24/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the ZTE Blade A75 4G notably outperforms the Tecno Pop 5X (36/100 vs 12/100). In the "design" category, the Tecno Pop 5X significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A75 4G (100/100 vs 63/100). In the "value for money" category, the ZTE Blade A75 4G significantly outperforms the Tecno Pop 5X (100/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Tecno Pop 5X | ZTE Blade A75 4G | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc | Unisoc T606 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 330006 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 378 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 1335 | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.6" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 720x1612 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 5W | |
| Main camera | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 2GB | 4GB | |
| Storage | 32GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 10 (Go edition), HiOS | Android 13 | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Dimensions | 166.0×75.9×8.5 mm | 164.1×75.8×8.6 mm | |
| Weight | 150 g | 189 g | |
| Price | — | $114 |
Tecno Pop 5X
- Main: 8MP
- Front: 5MP
ZTE Blade A75 4G
- Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
- Front: 8MP
Tecno Pop 5X
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
ZTE Blade A75 4G
- 6.6" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1612
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Tecno Pop 5X
- 4000 mAh
- No wireless charging
ZTE Blade A75 4G
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 5W
- No wireless charging
Tecno Pop 5X
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, the ZTE Blade A75 4G significantly outperforms the Tecno Pop 5X (50/100 vs 0/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the ZTE Blade A75 4G notably outperforms the Tecno Pop 5X (24/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the ZTE Blade A75 4G notably outperforms the Tecno Pop 5X (36/100 vs 12/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Tecno Pop 5X significantly outperforms the ZTE Blade A75 4G (100/100 vs 63/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the ZTE Blade A75 4G significantly outperforms the Tecno Pop 5X (100/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Tecno Pop 5X or the ZTE Blade A75 4G?
The ZTE Blade A75 4G is noticeably better than the Tecno Pop 5X — the overall rating gap is 16 points.
What is the rating of the Tecno Pop 5X and the ZTE Blade A75 4G?
The Tecno Pop 5X has a MobileRank rating of 9/100, the ZTE Blade A75 4G — 25/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Pop 5X or the ZTE Blade A75 4G?
The ZTE Blade A75 4G leads on camera score (24/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Pop 5X over the ZTE Blade A75 4G?
The Tecno Pop 5X is a better fit for everyday use. The ZTE Blade A75 4G is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.