Tecno Pop 5X vs Vivo X300 Pro
The Tecno Pop 5X (2022) runs on the Unisoc, while the Vivo X300 Pro (2025) runs on the Dimensity 9500. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Pro leads — 88/100 vs 28/100 (a 60-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Pro has the bigger battery (6510 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 8 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Pro has NFC for contactless payments, the Tecno Pop 5X doesn't; the Tecno Pop 5X is noticeably lighter (150g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Pop 5X
Vivo X300 Pro
What makes Tecno Pop 5X better?
- Lighter: 150g vs 226g
- Better portability (78/100 vs 43/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Pro better?
- Bigger battery: 6510 vs 4000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 8MP
- Better camera (96/100 vs 10/100)
- Longer battery life (81/100 vs 32/100)
- Better display (84/100 vs 39/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Pop 5X vs the Vivo X300 Pro, the Vivo X300 Pro scores 60 points higher (88/100 vs 28/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro leads (81/100 vs 32/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pop 5X (84/100 vs 39/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pop 5X (96/100 vs 10/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pop 5X (81/100 vs 32/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pop 5X significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (78/100 vs 43/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Pop 5X | Vivo X300 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Unisoc | Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 3326259 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 3293 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 10243 | |
| Display | 6.5" IPS LCD | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | — | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 4000 mAh | 6510 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | — | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 171 | |
| Main camera | 8 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 5 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 2GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 32GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 10 (Go edition), HiOS | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4500 nits | |
| NFC | no | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 166.0×75.9×8.5 mm | 161.2×75.5×8.0 mm | |
| Weight | 150 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $899 |
Camera comparison
Tecno Pop 5X
- Main: 8MP
- Front: 5MP
Vivo X300 Pro
- Main: 200MP f/1.57
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Tecno Pop 5X
- 6.5" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Pop 5X
- 4000 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Vivo X300 Pro
- 6510 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 13:30 hrs, total 24:37 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 40W
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Tecno Pop 5X
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pop 5X (84/100 vs 39/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pop 5X (96/100 vs 10/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pop 5X (81/100 vs 32/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Pop 5X significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Pro (78/100 vs 43/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Pop 5X or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Pop 5X by 60 points (88/100 vs 28/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Pop 5X and the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Tecno Pop 5X has a MobileRank rating of 28/100, the Vivo X300 Pro — 88/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Pop 5X or the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro leads on camera score (96/100 vs 10/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Pop 5X over the Vivo X300 Pro?
The Vivo X300 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.