Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G vs Vivo iQOO 16
The Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7300, while the Vivo iQOO 16 (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads — 89/100 vs 64/100 (a 25-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO 16 has the bigger battery (8400 mAh vs 5200); the Vivo iQOO 16 is faster in AnTuTu (5,498,720 vs 879,714); the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G is thinner (7.3mm vs 8.3mm).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G
Vivo iQOO 16
What makes Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G better?
- Better portability (78/100 vs 42/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO 16 better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 5498720 vs 879714
- Better Geekbench Single: 4327 vs 1001
- Better Geekbench Multi: 12873 vs 2918
- Bigger battery: 8400 vs 5200 mAh
- Faster charging: 100W vs 45W
- Higher refresh rate: 165Hz vs 144Hz
- Higher performance (100/100 vs 55/100)
- Better camera (78/100 vs 71/100)
- Longer battery life (90/100 vs 53/100)
- Better display (99/100 vs 89/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G vs the Vivo iQOO 16, the Vivo iQOO 16 scores 25 points higher (89/100 vs 64/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (100/100 vs 55/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 leads (90/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G (100/100 vs 55/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (99/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (78/100 vs 71/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G (90/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 16 (78/100 vs 42/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G | Vivo iQOO 16 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 7300 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Extreme Gen 6 | |
| AnTuTu | 879714 | 5498720 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1001 | 4327 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2918 | 12873 | |
| Display | 6.8" AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2436 | 1440x3168 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 165 Hz | |
| Battery | 5200 mAh | 8400 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 100W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 40W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 138 | — | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 8 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB / 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15, HIOS 15 | Android 17 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 6000 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP68/IP69 | |
| Dimensions | 164.3×74.6×7.3 mm | 163.8×76.9×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | — | 223 g | |
| Launch price | — | $840 |
Camera comparison
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo iQOO 16
- Main: 50MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2436
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo iQOO 16
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3168
- Refresh rate: 165 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO 16
- 8400 mAh
- Wired: 100W
- Wireless: 40W
Overall performance score
We compared Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G and Vivo iQOO 16, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO 16 leads Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G by 84.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G (100/100 vs 55/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (99/100 vs 89/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 is a bit better (78/100 vs 71/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G (90/100 vs 53/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO 16 (78/100 vs 42/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G by 25 points (89/100 vs 64/100).
What is the rating of the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G and the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G has a MobileRank rating of 64/100, the Vivo iQOO 16 — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on camera score (78/100 vs 71/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G or the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 leads on performance (100/100 vs 55/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Camon 40 Pro 5G over the Vivo iQOO 16?
The Vivo iQOO 16 is a better fit for gamers and power users, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.