Tecno Camon 40 Premier vs Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo
The Tecno Camon 40 Premier (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8350, while the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8400; launch prices were $450 and $250. By overall MobileRank rating, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier leads — 73/100 vs 65/100 (a 8-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo has the bigger battery (7620 mAh vs 5100); the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo is faster in AnTuTu (2,052,566 vs 1,724,757); the Tecno Camon 40 Premier is noticeably lighter (193g vs 212g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Tecno Camon 40 Premier
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo
What makes Tecno Camon 40 Premier better?
- Lighter: 193g vs 212g
- Better camera (81/100 vs 32/100)
- Better portability (66/100 vs 51/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2052566 vs 1724757
- Better Geekbench Single: 1579 vs 1398
- Better Geekbench Multi: 6100 vs 4313
- Bigger battery: 7620 vs 5100 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 70W
- Cheaper at launch: $250 vs $450
- Higher performance (76/100 vs 70/100)
- Longer battery life (71/100 vs 56/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Tecno Camon 40 Premier vs the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier scores 8 points higher (73/100 vs 65/100). In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier leads (81/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo leads (71/100 vs 56/100). Value score: Tecno Camon 40 Premier — 70/100, Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo — 80/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo is a bit better (76/100 vs 70/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 94/100. In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo (81/100 vs 32/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Premier (71/100 vs 56/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo (66/100 vs 51/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Tecno Camon 40 Premier | Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | MediaTek Dimensity 8350 | MediaTek Dimensity 8400 | |
| AnTuTu | 1724757 | 2052566 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1398 | 1579 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 4313 | 6100 | |
| Display | 6.7" LTPO AMOLED | 6.8" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1260x2800 | 1260x2800 | |
| Refresh rate | 144 Hz | 144 Hz | |
| Battery | 5100 mAh | 7620 mAh | |
| Charging | 70W | 90W | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 4400 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | — | IP65 | |
| Dimensions | 161.0×75.0×7.7 mm | 163.7×75.9×8.1 mm | |
| Weight | 193 g | 212 g | |
| Launch price | $450 | $250 |
Camera comparison
Tecno Camon 40 Premier
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo
- Main: 50MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Tecno Camon 40 Premier
- 6.7" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo
- 6.8" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1260x2800
- Refresh rate: 144 Hz
Battery and charging
Tecno Camon 40 Premier
- 5100 mAh
- Wired: 70W
- No wireless charging
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo
- 7620 mAh
- Wired: 90W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Tecno Camon 40 Premier and Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo leads Tecno Camon 40 Premier by 16.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $200. Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo was $200 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo is a bit better (76/100 vs 70/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 94/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo (81/100 vs 32/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo notably outperforms the Tecno Camon 40 Premier (71/100 vs 56/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo (66/100 vs 51/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Tecno Camon 40 Premier or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo?
The Tecno Camon 40 Premier edges out the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo by just 8 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Tecno Camon 40 Premier and the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo?
The Tecno Camon 40 Premier has a MobileRank rating of 73/100, the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo — 65/100.
Which has the better camera: the Tecno Camon 40 Premier or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo?
The Tecno Camon 40 Premier leads on camera score (81/100 vs 32/100).
Which is more powerful: the Tecno Camon 40 Premier or the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo?
The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo leads on performance (76/100 vs 70/100).
Should you choose the Tecno Camon 40 Premier over the Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo?
The Tecno Camon 40 Premier is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo iQOO Z10 Turbo is a better fit for active users, budget-conscious buyers.