Tecno Camon 30 Premier vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

The Tecno Camon 30 Premier (2024) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) (2025) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads — 87/100 vs 69/100 (a 18-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) has the bigger battery (6800 mAh vs 5000); the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is faster in AnTuTu (3,950,082 vs 1,240,821).

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is noticeably better than the Tecno Camon 30 Premier — the overall rating gap is 18 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Tecno Camon 30 Premier

Performance 65
Display 84
Camera 81
Battery 53
Portability 54
Value for money —

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

Performance 98
Display 81
Camera 87
Battery 83
Portability 42
Value for money 88

What makes Tecno Camon 30 Premier better?

  • Lighter: 210g vs 224g

  • Better display (84/100 vs 81/100)
  • Better portability (54/100 vs 42/100)

What makes Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3950082 vs 1240821
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1256
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 4207
  • Bigger battery: 6800 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 70W

  • Higher performance (98/100 vs 65/100)
  • Better camera (87/100 vs 81/100)
  • Longer battery life (83/100 vs 53/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Tecno Camon 30 Premier vs the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China), the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) scores 18 points higher (87/100 vs 69/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads (98/100 vs 65/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads (83/100 vs 53/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 30 Premier (98/100 vs 65/100). In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 30 Premier and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a bit better (87/100 vs 81/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 30 Premier (83/100 vs 53/100). In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 30 Premier is a bit better (54/100 vs 42/100).

Tecno Camon 30 Premier: The Tecno Camon 30 Premier is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China): The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Tecno Camon 30 Premier Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)
Processor MediaTek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 1240821 3950082
Geekbench Single 1256 3639
Geekbench Multi 4207 11047
Display 6.8" LTPO AMOLED 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1264x2780 1200x2608
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 6800 mAh
Charging 70W 90W
Wireless charging 0W 50W
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 50 MP 200 MP
Front camera 50 MP 50 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 512GB 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, HIOS 14 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 1400 nits —
NFC yes yes
Protection IP54 IP68/IP69
Dimensions 162.7×76.2×7.9 mm 162.9×77.6×8.3 mm
Weight 210 g 224 g
Launch price — $892

Camera comparison

Tecno Camon 30 Premier

  • Main: 50MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
81
camera

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

  • Main: 50MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 50MP
87
camera

Display comparison

Tecno Camon 30 Premier

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1264x2780
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

  • 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1200x2608
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display

Battery and charging

Tecno Camon 30 Premier

  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 70W
  • No wireless charging
53
battery

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

  • 6800 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 50W
83
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Tecno Camon 30 Premier and Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Tecno Camon 30 Premier MediaTek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate
69/100
1240821 AnTuTu
Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
87/100 +68.6%
3950082 AnTuTu

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads Tecno Camon 30 Premier by 68.6% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Tecno Camon 30 Premier

Price unknown

Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)

$892

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 30 Premier (98/100 vs 65/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Tecno Camon 30 Premier and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) are nearly equal (84/100 vs 81/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a bit better (87/100 vs 81/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 30 Premier (83/100 vs 53/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Tecno Camon 30 Premier is a bit better (54/100 vs 42/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Tecno Camon 30 Premier or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is noticeably better than the Tecno Camon 30 Premier — the overall rating gap is 18 points.

What is the rating of the Tecno Camon 30 Premier and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Tecno Camon 30 Premier has a MobileRank rating of 69/100, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) — 87/100.

Which has the better camera: the Tecno Camon 30 Premier or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads on camera score (87/100 vs 81/100).

Which is more powerful: the Tecno Camon 30 Premier or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) leads on performance (98/100 vs 65/100).

Should you choose the Tecno Camon 30 Premier over the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China)?

The Tecno Camon 30 Premier is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Xiaomi 17 Ultra (China) is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.