Sony Xperia 5 II vs Vivo X300 Ultra

The Sony Xperia 5 II (2020) runs on the Snapdragon 865, while the Vivo X300 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $949 and $950. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads — 91/100 vs 48/100 (a 43-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X300 Ultra has the bigger battery (7000 mAh vs 4000); the main camera is 12 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X300 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (4,247,433 vs 986,701); the Sony Xperia 5 II is noticeably lighter (163g vs 230g).

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Sony Xperia 5 II by 43 points (91/100 vs 48/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Sony Xperia 5 II
Performance 60
Display 84
Camera 20
Battery 22
Portability 81
Value for money 8
Vivo X300 Ultra
Performance 99
Display 89
Camera 96
Battery 85
Portability 39
Value for money 94
What makes Sony Xperia 5 II better?
  • Lighter: 163g vs 230g
  • Cheaper at launch: $949 vs $950

  • Better portability (81/100 vs 39/100)
What makes Vivo X300 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 4247433 vs 986701
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1168
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 3431
  • Bigger battery: 7000 vs 4000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 21W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 12MP

  • Higher performance (99/100 vs 60/100)
  • Better camera (96/100 vs 20/100)
  • Longer battery life (85/100 vs 22/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 84/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Sony Xperia 5 II vs the Vivo X300 Ultra, the Vivo X300 Ultra scores 43 points higher (91/100 vs 48/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (99/100 vs 60/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (96/100 vs 20/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra leads (85/100 vs 22/100). Value score: Sony Xperia 5 II — 8/100, Vivo X300 Ultra — 94/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Sony Xperia 5 II (99/100 vs 60/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Sony Xperia 5 II (96/100 vs 20/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Sony Xperia 5 II (85/100 vs 22/100). In the "portability" category, the Sony Xperia 5 II significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (81/100 vs 39/100).

Sony Xperia 5 II: The Sony Xperia 5 II is a better fit for active users.
Vivo X300 Ultra: The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.
Specs comparison
Specification Sony Xperia 5 II Vivo X300 Ultra
Processor Snapdragon 865 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 986701 4247433
Geekbench Single 1168 3640
Geekbench Multi 3431 11033
Display 6.1" OLED 6.8" LTPO OLED
Resolution 1080x2520 3168x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4000 mAh 7000 mAh
Charging 21W 100W
Wireless charging 0W 40W
DXOMark (camera) 170
Main camera 12 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 12 MP 200 MP
Front camera 8 MP 32 MP
RAM 8GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 10 Android 16
NFC yes yes
Protection IP65/IP68 IP69
Dimensions 158.0×68.0×8.0 mm 163.0×76.8×8.2 mm
Weight 163 g 230 g
Launch price $949 $950
Camera comparison
Sony Xperia 5 II
  • Main: 12MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 12MP
  • Front: 8MP
20
camera
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.6
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
96
camera
Display comparison
Sony Xperia 5 II
  • 6.1" OLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2520
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
84
display
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 6.8" LTPO OLED
  • Resolution: 3168x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display
Battery and charging
Sony Xperia 5 II
  • 4000 mAh
  • Wired: 21W
  • No wireless charging
22
battery
Vivo X300 Ultra
  • 7000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 10:18 hrs, total 29:11 hrs
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 40W
85
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Sony Xperia 5 II and Vivo X300 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Sony Xperia 5 II Snapdragon 865
48/100
986701 AnTuTu
Vivo X300 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
91/100 +76.8%
4247433 AnTuTu

Vivo X300 Ultra leads Sony Xperia 5 II by 76.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Sony Xperia 5 II
$949
Vivo X300 Ultra
$950

Launch price difference: $1. Sony Xperia 5 II was $1 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Sony Xperia 5 II (99/100 vs 60/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 84/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Sony Xperia 5 II (96/100 vs 20/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Sony Xperia 5 II (85/100 vs 22/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Sony Xperia 5 II significantly outperforms the Vivo X300 Ultra (81/100 vs 39/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Sony Xperia 5 II or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra significantly outperforms the Sony Xperia 5 II by 43 points (91/100 vs 48/100).

What is the rating of the Sony Xperia 5 II and the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Sony Xperia 5 II has a MobileRank rating of 48/100, the Vivo X300 Ultra — 91/100.

Which has the better camera: the Sony Xperia 5 II or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on camera score (96/100 vs 20/100).

Which is more powerful: the Sony Xperia 5 II or the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Vivo X300 Ultra leads on performance (99/100 vs 60/100).

Should you choose the Sony Xperia 5 II over the Vivo X300 Ultra?

The Sony Xperia 5 II is a better fit for active users. The Vivo X300 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.