Sharp Aquos R11 vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra
The Sharp Aquos R11 (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8s Gen 4, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 74/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5100); the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,600,724 vs 2,314,417); the Sharp Aquos R11 is noticeably lighter (195g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Sharp Aquos R11
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
What makes Sharp Aquos R11 better?
- Higher refresh rate: 240Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 195g vs 226g
- Better display (90/100 vs 89/100)
- Better portability (52/100 vs 40/100)
What makes Xiaomi 17 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3600724 vs 2314417
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 2072
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 6649
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5100 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 36W
- Higher performance (97/100 vs 81/100)
- Better camera (93/100 vs 76/100)
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 49/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Sharp Aquos R11 vs the Xiaomi 17 Ultra, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra scores 15 points higher (89/100 vs 74/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (97/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 76/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (80/100 vs 49/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R11 (97/100 vs 81/100). In the "display" category, the Sharp Aquos R11 and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra are nearly equal (90/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R11 (93/100 vs 76/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos R11 (80/100 vs 49/100). In the "portability" category, the Sharp Aquos R11 is a bit better (52/100 vs 40/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Sharp Aquos R11 | Xiaomi 17 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Snapdragon 8s Gen 4 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 2314417 | 3600724 | |
| Geekbench Single | 2072 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 6649 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.5" PRO IGZO LTPO OLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 3200x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5100 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 36W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 166 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 38 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 16 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3600 nits | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68/IP69 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 156.0×74.0×8.9 mm | 162.9×77.6×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 195 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $999 |
Camera comparison
Sharp Aquos R11
- Main: 50MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 38MP
- Front: 50MP
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.63
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Sharp Aquos R11
- 6.5" PRO IGZO LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 240 Hz
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Sharp Aquos R11
- 5100 mAh
- Wired: 36W
- No wireless charging
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 16:09 hrs, total 33:23 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Sharp Aquos R11 and Xiaomi 17 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads Sharp Aquos R11 by 35.7% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Sharp Aquos R11
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R11 (97/100 vs 81/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Sharp Aquos R11 and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra are nearly equal (90/100 vs 89/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R11 (93/100 vs 76/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos R11 (80/100 vs 49/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Sharp Aquos R11 is a bit better (52/100 vs 40/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Sharp Aquos R11 or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra is noticeably better than the Sharp Aquos R11 — the overall rating gap is 15 points.
What is the rating of the Sharp Aquos R11 and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Sharp Aquos R11 has a MobileRank rating of 74/100, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Sharp Aquos R11 or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 76/100).
Which is more powerful: the Sharp Aquos R11 or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads on performance (97/100 vs 81/100).
Should you choose the Sharp Aquos R11 over the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Sharp Aquos R11 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.