Sharp Aquos R10 vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra
The Sharp Aquos R10 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 66/100 (a 23-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5000); the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,600,724 vs 1,660,924); the Sharp Aquos R10 is noticeably lighter (197g vs 226g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Sharp Aquos R10
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
What makes Sharp Aquos R10 better?
- Higher refresh rate: 240Hz vs 120Hz
- Lighter: 197g vs 226g
- Better display (90/100 vs 89/100)
- Better portability (51/100 vs 40/100)
What makes Xiaomi 17 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3600724 vs 1660924
- Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 1860
- Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 5045
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5000 mAh
- Faster charging: 90W vs 36W
- Higher performance (97/100 vs 74/100)
- Better camera (93/100 vs 60/100)
- Longer battery life (80/100 vs 46/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Sharp Aquos R10 vs the Xiaomi 17 Ultra, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra scores 23 points higher (89/100 vs 66/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (97/100 vs 74/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (80/100 vs 46/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R10 (97/100 vs 74/100). In the "display" category, the Sharp Aquos R10 and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra are nearly equal (90/100 vs 89/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos R10 (93/100 vs 60/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos R10 (80/100 vs 46/100). In the "portability" category, the Sharp Aquos R10 is a bit better (51/100 vs 40/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Sharp Aquos R10 | Xiaomi 17 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 3 | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 | |
| AnTuTu | 1660924 | 3600724 | |
| Geekbench Single | 1860 | 3639 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 5045 | 11047 | |
| Display | 6.5" PRO IGZO LTPO OLED | 6.8" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2340 | 3200x1440 | |
| Refresh rate | 240 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 36W | 90W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | — | 166 | |
| Main camera | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 0 MP | 200 MP | |
| Front camera | 50 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB | 12GB / 16GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | |
| OS | Android 15 | Android 16 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 3000 nits | 3500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 156.0×75.0×8.9 mm | 162.9×77.6×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 197 g | 226 g | |
| Launch price | — | $999 |
Camera comparison
Sharp Aquos R10
- Main: 50MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Front: 50MP
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.63
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 200MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Sharp Aquos R10
- 6.5" PRO IGZO LTPO OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 240 Hz
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
- 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 3200x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Sharp Aquos R10
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 36W
- No wireless charging
Xiaomi 17 Ultra
- 6000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 16:09 hrs, total 33:23 hrs
- Wired: 90W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Sharp Aquos R10 and Xiaomi 17 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads Sharp Aquos R10 by 53.9% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Sharp Aquos R10
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra notably outperforms the Sharp Aquos R10 (97/100 vs 74/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Sharp Aquos R10 and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra are nearly equal (90/100 vs 89/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos R10 (93/100 vs 60/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos R10 (80/100 vs 46/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Sharp Aquos R10 is a bit better (51/100 vs 40/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Sharp Aquos R10 or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Sharp Aquos R10 by 23 points (89/100 vs 66/100).
What is the rating of the Sharp Aquos R10 and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Sharp Aquos R10 has a MobileRank rating of 66/100, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra — 89/100.
Which has the better camera: the Sharp Aquos R10 or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 60/100).
Which is more powerful: the Sharp Aquos R10 or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads on performance (97/100 vs 74/100).
Should you choose the Sharp Aquos R10 over the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?
The Sharp Aquos R10 is a better fit for active users. The Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.