Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs Vivo Y23 Pro
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo Y23 Pro (2022) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 1200 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 56/100 (a 13-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 4300); the main camera is 200 MP vs 108 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 960,724); the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y23 Pro doesn't; the Vivo Y23 Pro is noticeably lighter (171g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Vivo Y23 Pro
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 960724
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1143
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 3353
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 4300 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 108MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 59/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 42/100)
- Better display (70/100 vs 67/100)
What makes Vivo Y23 Pro better?
- Lighter: 171g vs 309g
- Better portability (83/100 vs 20/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs the Vivo Y23 Pro, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 13 points higher (69/100 vs 56/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 59/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 42/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y23 Pro (90/100 vs 59/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Vivo Y23 Pro are nearly equal (70/100 vs 67/100). In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 52/100. In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Vivo Y23 Pro (63/100 vs 42/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y23 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (83/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Vivo Y23 Pro | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 () | |
| AnTuTu | 2926532 | 960724 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 1143 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 3353 | |
| Display | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.6" | |
| Resolution | 2160x1584 | 1080x2376 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 5600 mAh | 4300 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | — | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 108 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | — | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | Android 12 Snow Cone | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | — | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP48 | — | |
| Dimensions | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | 159.5×73.3×7.4 mm | |
| Weight | 309 g | 171 g | |
| Launch price | $2899 | — |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo Y23 Pro
- Main: 108MP
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Front: 50MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y23 Pro
- 6.6"
- Resolution: 1080x2376
- Refresh rate: —
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo Y23 Pro
- 4300 mAh
- Wireless charging: no data
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and Vivo Y23 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Vivo Y23 Pro by 204.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo Y23 Pro
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y23 Pro (90/100 vs 59/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Vivo Y23 Pro are nearly equal (70/100 vs 67/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 52/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Vivo Y23 Pro (63/100 vs 42/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo Y23 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (83/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo Y23 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is noticeably better than the Vivo Y23 Pro — the overall rating gap is 13 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Vivo Y23 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has a MobileRank rating of 69/100, the Vivo Y23 Pro — 56/100.
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo Y23 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 59/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold over the Vivo Y23 Pro?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.