Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs Vivo Y19s
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo Y19s (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 6300; estimated prices are $2899 and $110. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 57/100 vs 20/100 (a 37-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y19s has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 5600); the main camera is 200 MP vs 13 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 524,785); the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y19s doesn't; the Vivo Y19s is noticeably lighter (199g vs 309g).
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Vivo Y19s
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 524785
- Better Geekbench Single: 3050 vs 771
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9300 vs 1980
- Faster charging: 45W vs 15W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 13MP
- Higher refresh rate: 120Hz vs 90Hz
- Higher performance (67/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (49/100 vs 0/100)
- Longer battery life (52/100 vs 45/100)
- Better display (100/100 vs 50/100)
- Bigger battery: 6000 vs 5600 mAh
- Lighter: 199g vs 309g
- Cheaper: $110 vs $2899
- Better design/ergonomics (51/100 vs 0/100)
- Better value for money (100/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs the Vivo Y19s, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 37 points higher (57/100 vs 20/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (49/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo Y19s leads (100/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y19s (67/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y19s (100/100 vs 50/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y19s (49/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 45/100). In the "design" category, the Vivo Y19s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (51/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Vivo Y19s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (100/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Vivo Y19s | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 6300 | |
| AnTuTu | 2926532 | 524785 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3050 | 771 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9300 | 1980 | |
| Display | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.7" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 2160x1584 | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 90 Hz | |
| Battery | 5600 mAh | 6000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 15W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 13 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 0 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 5 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 4GB / 6GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 64GB / 128GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | 700 nits | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP64 | |
| Dimensions | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | 167.3×77.0×8.2 mm | |
| Weight | 309 g | 199 g | |
| Price | $2899 | $110 |
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo Y19s
- Main: 13MP f/f/2.2
- Front: 5MP
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo Y19s
- 6.7" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: 90 Hz
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo Y19s
- 6000 mAh
- Wired: 15W
- No wireless charging
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and Vivo Y19s, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Vivo Y19s by 457.7% in our overall performance rating.
Price difference: $2789. Vivo Y19s is cheaper by $2789.
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y19s (67/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y19s (100/100 vs 50/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y19s (49/100 vs 0/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (52/100 vs 45/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Vivo Y19s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (51/100 vs 0/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Vivo Y19s significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (100/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo Y19s?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the Vivo Y19s by 37 points (57/100 vs 20/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Vivo Y19s?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has a MobileRank rating of 57/100, the Vivo Y19s — 20/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo Y19s?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on camera score (49/100 vs 0/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo Y19s?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (67/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold over the Vivo Y19s?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for active users. The Vivo Y19s is a better fit for budget-conscious buyers.