Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs Vivo X Note
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo X Note (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 66/100 (a 3-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 1,294,871); the Vivo X Note is noticeably lighter (216g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
Vivo X Note
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 1294871
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1662
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 4188
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5000 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 68/100)
What makes Vivo X Note better?
- Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
- Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
- Lighter: 216g vs 309g
- Better camera (55/100 vs 52/100)
- Longer battery life (71/100 vs 63/100)
- Better display (87/100 vs 70/100)
- Better portability (45/100 vs 20/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs the Vivo X Note, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 3 points higher (69/100 vs 66/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 68/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Vivo X Note (90/100 vs 68/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo X Note notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (87/100 vs 70/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Note and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (55/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Note is a bit better (71/100 vs 63/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Note notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (45/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | Vivo X Note | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | 2926532 | 1294871 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 1662 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 4188 | |
| Display | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 7.0" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 2160x1584 | 1440x3080 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5600 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 48 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 8 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | Android 12, Origin OS Ocean | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | 1500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | 168.8×80.3×8.4 mm | |
| Weight | 309 g | 216 g | |
| Launch price | $2899 | — |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo X Note
- Main: 50MP f/1.6
- Ultrawide: 48MP
- Telephoto: 8MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X Note
- 7.0" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 1440x3080
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo X Note
- 5000 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and Vivo X Note, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads Vivo X Note by 126.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo X Note
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold notably outperforms the Vivo X Note (90/100 vs 68/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Vivo X Note notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (87/100 vs 70/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Note and the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold are nearly equal (55/100 vs 52/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Note is a bit better (71/100 vs 63/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Note notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (45/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo X Note?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold edges out the Vivo X Note by just 3 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the Vivo X Note?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has a MobileRank rating of 69/100, the Vivo X Note — 66/100.
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the Vivo X Note?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 68/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold over the Vivo X Note?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X Note is a better fit for active users.