Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra (2025) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 7400; launch prices were $2899 and $329. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads — 69/100 vs 57/100 (a 12-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has the bigger battery (5600 mAh vs 5200); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is faster in AnTuTu (2,926,532 vs 953,150); the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra is noticeably lighter (227g vs 309g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 2926532 vs 953150
- Better Geekbench Single: 3013 vs 1061
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9287 vs 3185
- Bigger battery: 5600 vs 5200 mAh
- Faster charging: 45W vs 33W
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
- Higher performance (90/100 vs 57/100)
- Longer battery life (63/100 vs 50/100)
- Better display (70/100 vs 63/100)
What makes TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra better?
- Lighter: 227g vs 309g
- Cheaper at launch: $329 vs $2899
- Better camera (61/100 vs 52/100)
- Better portability (47/100 vs 20/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold vs the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold scores 12 points higher (69/100 vs 57/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (90/100 vs 57/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads (63/100 vs 50/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold — 46/100, TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra — 50/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra (90/100 vs 57/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (70/100 vs 63/100). In the "camera" category, the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra is a bit better (61/100 vs 52/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (63/100 vs 50/100). In the "portability" category, the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (47/100 vs 20/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold | TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | MediaTek Dimensity 7400 | |
| AnTuTu | 2926532 | 953150 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3013 | 1061 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9287 | 3185 | |
| Display | 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 7.2" IPS LCD | |
| Resolution | 2160x1584 | 1080x2340 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5600 mAh | 5200 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 33W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 50 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 12 MP | 8 MP | |
| Telephoto | 10 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 32 MP | |
| RAM | 16GB | 12GB | |
| Storage | 512GB | 256GB / 512GB | |
| OS | Android 16 / One UI 8 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | 850 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP48 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | 159.2×75.0×12.9 mm | 174.5×81.2×7.6 mm | |
| Weight | 309 g | 227 g | |
| Launch price | $2899 | $329 |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Telephoto: 10MP
- Front: 10MP
TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra
- Main: 50MP f/1.8
- Ultrawide: 8MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 32MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 10.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 2160x1584
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra
- 7.2" IPS LCD
- Resolution: 1080x2340
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold
- 5600 mAh
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra
- 5200 mAh
- Wired: 33W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra by 207.0% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Launch price difference: $2570. TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra was $2570 cheaper at launch.
Detailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold significantly outperforms the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra (90/100 vs 57/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (70/100 vs 63/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra is a bit better (61/100 vs 52/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a bit better (63/100 vs 50/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold (47/100 vs 20/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is noticeably better than the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra — the overall rating gap is 12 points.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold and the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold has a MobileRank rating of 69/100, the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra — 57/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra?
The TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra leads on camera score (61/100 vs 52/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold or the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold leads on performance (90/100 vs 57/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold over the TCL NxtPaper 60 Ultra?
The Samsung Galaxy Z TriFold is a better fit for gamers and power users.