Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra vs Vivo T4

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra (2026) runs on the Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5, while the Vivo T4 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3; launch prices were $2199 and $299. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads — 79/100 vs 58/100 (a 21-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo T4 has the bigger battery (7300 mAh vs 5000); the main camera is 200 MP vs 50 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,942,923 vs 1,040,961); the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo T4 doesn't; the Vivo T4 is noticeably lighter (199g vs 215g).

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo T4 by 21 points (79/100 vs 58/100).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
Performance 98
Display 78
Camera 67
Battery 61
Portability 66
Value for money 62
Vivo T4
Performance 60
Display 79
Camera 37
Battery 71
Portability 60
Value for money 58
What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra better?
  • Higher AnTuTu: 3942923 vs 1040961
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3640 vs 1162
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11033 vs 3315
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP

  • Higher performance (98/100 vs 60/100)
  • Better camera (67/100 vs 37/100)
  • Better portability (66/100 vs 60/100)
What makes Vivo T4 better?
  • Bigger battery: 7300 vs 5000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 60W
  • Lighter: 199g vs 215g
  • Cheaper at launch: $299 vs $2199

  • Longer battery life (71/100 vs 61/100)
  • Better display (79/100 vs 78/100)
Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra vs the Vivo T4, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra scores 21 points higher (79/100 vs 58/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads (98/100 vs 60/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads (67/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo T4 leads (71/100 vs 61/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra — 62/100, Vivo T4 — 58/100; it is biased by price level, so it should not be compared directly between devices at different prices. In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo T4 (98/100 vs 60/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo T4 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra are nearly equal (79/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo T4 (67/100 vs 37/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo T4 is a bit better (71/100 vs 61/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a bit better (66/100 vs 60/100).

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Vivo T4: The Vivo T4 is a better fit for active users.
Specs comparison
Specification Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra Vivo T4
Processor Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
AnTuTu 3942923 1040961
Geekbench Single 3640 1162
Geekbench Multi 11033 3315
Display 8.0" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X 6.8" AMOLED
Resolution 1968x2184 2392x1080
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 5000 mAh 7300 mAh
Charging 60W 90W
Wireless charging 25W 0W
Main camera 200 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 50 MP 0 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 0 MP
Front camera 10 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 8GB / 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 16 / One UI 8.5 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 5000 nits
NFC yes no
Protection IP48 IP65
Dimensions 163.4×76.4×7.9 mm
Weight 215 g 199 g
Launch price $2199 $299
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
  • Main: 200MP f/f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
67
camera
Vivo T4
  • Main: 50MP f/f/1.8
  • Front: 32MP
37
camera
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
  • 8.0" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 1968x2184
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
78
display
Vivo T4
  • 6.8" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2392x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
79
display
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
  • 5000 mAh
  • Wired: 60W
  • Wireless: 25W
61
battery
Vivo T4
  • 7300 mAh
  • Wired: 90W
  • No wireless charging
71
battery
Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra and Vivo T4, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
79/100
3942923 AnTuTu
Vivo T4 Qualcomm Snapdragon 7s Gen 3
58/100 -278.8%
1040961 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads Vivo T4 by 278.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra
$2199
Vivo T4
$299

Launch price difference: $1900. Vivo T4 was $1900 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis
performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo T4 (98/100 vs 60/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo T4 and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra are nearly equal (79/100 vs 78/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo T4 (67/100 vs 37/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo T4 is a bit better (71/100 vs 61/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a bit better (66/100 vs 60/100).

Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra or the Vivo T4?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo T4 by 21 points (79/100 vs 58/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra and the Vivo T4?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 79/100, the Vivo T4 — 58/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra or the Vivo T4?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads on camera score (67/100 vs 37/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra or the Vivo T4?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra leads on performance (98/100 vs 60/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra over the Vivo T4?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold8 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo T4 is a better fit for active users.