Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 vs Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China)

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads — 75/100 vs 60/100 (a 15-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) has the bigger battery (4700 mAh vs 4400); the main camera is 200 MP vs 64 MP; the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is faster in AnTuTu (3,065,623 vs 1,294,871); the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) is noticeably lighter (194g vs 215g).

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is noticeably better than the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) — the overall rating gap is 15 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

Performance 91
Display 78
Camera 76
Battery 39
Portability 66
Value for money 58

Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China)

Performance 68
Display 80
Camera 45
Battery 50
Portability 57
Value for money —

What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3065623 vs 1294871
  • Better Geekbench Single: 2910 vs 1662
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 9174 vs 4188
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP

  • Higher performance (91/100 vs 68/100)
  • Better camera (76/100 vs 45/100)
  • Better portability (66/100 vs 57/100)

What makes Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) better?

  • Bigger battery: 4700 vs 4400 mAh
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 25W
  • Lighter: 194g vs 215g

  • Longer battery life (50/100 vs 39/100)
  • Better display (80/100 vs 78/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 vs the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China), the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 scores 15 points higher (75/100 vs 60/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads (91/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads (76/100 vs 45/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) leads (50/100 vs 39/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) (91/100 vs 68/100). In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 are nearly equal (80/100 vs 78/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) (76/100 vs 45/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) is a bit better (50/100 vs 39/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a bit better (66/100 vs 57/100).

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7: The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China): The Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) is a better fit for active users.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China)
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
AnTuTu 3065623 1294871
Geekbench Single 2910 1662
Geekbench Multi 9174 4188
Display 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X 6.6" AMOLED
Resolution 2184x1968 1080x2400
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4400 mAh 4700 mAh
Charging 25W 80W
Wireless charging 15W 0W
DXOMark (camera) 145 —
Main camera 200 MP 64 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 12 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 0 MP
Front camera 10 MP 16 MP
RAM 12GB / 16GB 8GB / 12GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB / 1TB 128GB / 256GB
OS Android 16 / One UI 8 Android 12, Origin OS Ocean
Brightness (peak) 2600 nits 1300 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48 —
Dimensions 158.4×143.2×4.2 mm 163.0×76.2×8.5 mm
Weight 215 g 194 g
Launch price $1999 —

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 10MP
76
camera

Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China)

  • Main: 64MP f/1.9
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Front: 16MP
45
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

  • 8.0" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2184x1968
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
78
display

Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China)

  • 6.6" AMOLED
  • Resolution: 1080x2400
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

  • 4400 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
39
battery

Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China)

  • 4700 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • No wireless charging
50
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 and Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
75/100
3065623 AnTuTu
Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1
60/100 -136.8%
1294871 AnTuTu

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) by 136.8% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7

$1999

Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China)

Price unknown

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) (91/100 vs 68/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) and the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 are nearly equal (80/100 vs 78/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) (76/100 vs 45/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) is a bit better (50/100 vs 39/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a bit better (66/100 vs 57/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 or the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China)?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is noticeably better than the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) — the overall rating gap is 15 points.

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 and the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China)?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 has a MobileRank rating of 75/100, the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) — 60/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 or the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China)?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads on camera score (76/100 vs 45/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 or the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China)?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 leads on performance (91/100 vs 68/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 over the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China)?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Fold7 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) is a better fit for active users.