Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China)
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) (2022) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1. By overall MobileRank rating, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads — 80/100 vs 60/100 (a 20-point difference). Key differences: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 4700); the main camera is 200 MP vs 64 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,128,552 vs 1,294,871); the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) is noticeably lighter (194g vs 218g).
Profile comparison
Category scores
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China)
What makes Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra better?
- Higher AnTuTu: 3128552 vs 1294871
- Better Geekbench Single: 3100 vs 1662
- Better Geekbench Multi: 9760 vs 4188
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 4700 mAh
- Better main camera: 200MP vs 64MP
- Higher performance (92/100 vs 68/100)
- Better camera (81/100 vs 45/100)
- Longer battery life (56/100 vs 50/100)
- Better display (88/100 vs 80/100)
What makes Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) better?
- Faster charging: 80W vs 45W
- Lighter: 194g vs 218g
- Better portability (57/100 vs 46/100)
Comparison verdict
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China), the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra scores 20 points higher (80/100 vs 60/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads (92/100 vs 68/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads (81/100 vs 45/100). In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) (92/100 vs 68/100). In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a bit better (88/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) (81/100 vs 45/100). In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a bit better (56/100 vs 50/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) is a bit better (57/100 vs 46/100).
Specs comparison
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra | Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 | |
| AnTuTu | 3128552 | 1294871 | |
| Geekbench Single | 3100 | 1662 | |
| Geekbench Multi | 9760 | 4188 | |
| Display | 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X | 6.6" AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 3120x1440 | 1080x2400 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | 5000 mAh | 4700 mAh | |
| Charging | 45W | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 15W | 0W | |
| DXOMark (camera) | 151 | — | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 64 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 12 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 0 MP | |
| Front camera | 12 MP | 16 MP | |
| RAM | 12GB / 16GB | 8GB / 12GB | |
| Storage | 256GB / 512GB / 1TB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | Android 15 / One UI 7 | Android 12, Origin OS Ocean | |
| Brightness (peak) | 2600 nits | 1300 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 162.8×77.6×8.2 mm | 163.0×76.2×8.5 mm | |
| Weight | 218 g | 194 g | |
| Launch price | $1299 | — |
Camera comparison
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- Main: 200MP f/1.7
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 12MP
Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China)
- Main: 64MP f/1.9
- Ultrawide: 12MP
- Front: 16MP
Display comparison
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
- Resolution: 3120x1440
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China)
- 6.6" AMOLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Battery and charging
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra
- 5000 mAh
- NanoReview test: web browsing 11:10 hrs, total 28:43 hrs
- Wired: 45W
- Wireless: 15W
Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China)
- 4700 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- No wireless charging
Overall performance score
We compared Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China), covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) by 141.6% in our overall performance rating.
Benchmarks
Launch prices and where to check today's
Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China)
Price unknownDetailed category analysis
performance
In the "performance" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra notably outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) (92/100 vs 68/100).
display
In the "display" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a bit better (88/100 vs 80/100).
camera
In the "camera" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) (81/100 vs 45/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a bit better (56/100 vs 50/100).
portability
In the "portability" category, the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) is a bit better (57/100 vs 46/100).
Frequently asked questions
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra or the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China)?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra significantly outperforms the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) by 20 points (80/100 vs 60/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China)?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra has a MobileRank rating of 80/100, the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) — 60/100.
Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra or the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China)?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads on camera score (81/100 vs 45/100).
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra or the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China)?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra leads on performance (92/100 vs 68/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra over the Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China)?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo iQOO Neo6 (China) is a better fit for active users.