Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 vs Xiaomi 17 Pro

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 (2025) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2500, while the Xiaomi 17 Pro (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $1099 and $825. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Pro leads — 86/100 vs 72/100 (a 14-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 Pro has the bigger battery (6300 mAh vs 4300); the Xiaomi 17 Pro is faster in AnTuTu (3,569,354 vs 2,289,696); the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 is thinner (6.5mm vs 8.0mm).

The Xiaomi 17 Pro is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 — the overall rating gap is 14 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7

Performance 84
Display 81
Camera 70
Battery 37
Portability 83
Value for money 54

Xiaomi 17 Pro

Performance 95
Display 85
Camera 81
Battery 84
Portability 64
Value for money 86

What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 better?

  • Lighter: 188g vs 192g

  • Better portability (83/100 vs 64/100)

What makes Xiaomi 17 Pro better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3569354 vs 2289696
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3310 vs 2358
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10070 vs 8211
  • Bigger battery: 6300 vs 4300 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
  • Cheaper at launch: $825 vs $1099

  • Higher performance (95/100 vs 84/100)
  • Better camera (81/100 vs 70/100)
  • Longer battery life (84/100 vs 37/100)
  • Better display (85/100 vs 81/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 vs the Xiaomi 17 Pro, the Xiaomi 17 Pro scores 14 points higher (86/100 vs 72/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro leads (95/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro leads (81/100 vs 70/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro leads (84/100 vs 37/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 — 54/100, Xiaomi 17 Pro — 86/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro is a bit better (95/100 vs 84/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 are nearly equal (85/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro is a bit better (81/100 vs 70/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 (84/100 vs 37/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Pro (83/100 vs 64/100).

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7: The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Xiaomi 17 Pro: The Xiaomi 17 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Xiaomi 17 Pro
Processor Samsung Exynos 2500 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 2289696 3569354
Geekbench Single 2358 3310
Geekbench Multi 8211 10070
Display 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X 6.3" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2640x1080 2656x1220
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4300 mAh 6300 mAh
Charging 25W 100W
Wireless charging 15W 50W
DXOMark (camera) 137 —
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 10 MP 50 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 / One UI 8 Android 16 / HyperOS 3
Brightness (peak) 2600 nits 3500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48 IP68
Dimensions 166.7×75.2×6.5 mm 151.1×71.8×8.0 mm
Weight 188 g 192 g
Launch price $1099 $825

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Front: 10MP
70
camera

Xiaomi 17 Pro

  • Main: 50MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 50MP
81
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7

  • 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2640x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display

Xiaomi 17 Pro

  • 6.3" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2656x1220
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
85
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7

  • 4300 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
37
battery

Xiaomi 17 Pro

  • 6300 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 50W
84
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 and Xiaomi 17 Pro, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Samsung Exynos 2500
72/100
2289696 AnTuTu
Xiaomi 17 Pro Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
86/100 +35.9%
3569354 AnTuTu

Xiaomi 17 Pro leads Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 by 35.9% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7

$1099

Xiaomi 17 Pro

$825

Launch price difference: $274. Xiaomi 17 Pro was $274 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro is a bit better (95/100 vs 84/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 are nearly equal (85/100 vs 81/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro is a bit better (81/100 vs 70/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Pro significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 (84/100 vs 37/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 notably outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Pro (83/100 vs 64/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 or the Xiaomi 17 Pro?

The Xiaomi 17 Pro is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 — the overall rating gap is 14 points.

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 and the Xiaomi 17 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 has a MobileRank rating of 72/100, the Xiaomi 17 Pro — 86/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 or the Xiaomi 17 Pro?

The Xiaomi 17 Pro leads on camera score (81/100 vs 70/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 or the Xiaomi 17 Pro?

The Xiaomi 17 Pro leads on performance (95/100 vs 84/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 over the Xiaomi 17 Pro?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Xiaomi 17 Pro is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.