Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 vs Xiaomi 17 Max

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 (2025) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2500, while the Xiaomi 17 Max (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $1099 and $799. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Max leads — 88/100 vs 72/100 (a 16-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 Max has the bigger battery (8000 mAh vs 4300); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Xiaomi 17 Max is faster in AnTuTu (3,654,776 vs 2,289,696); the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 is noticeably lighter (188g vs 219g).

The Xiaomi 17 Max is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 — the overall rating gap is 16 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7

Performance 84
Display 81
Camera 70
Battery 37
Portability 83
Value for money 54

Xiaomi 17 Max

Performance 97
Display 81
Camera 90
Battery 90
Portability 40
Value for money 90

What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 better?

  • Lighter: 188g vs 219g

  • Better portability (83/100 vs 40/100)

What makes Xiaomi 17 Max better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3654776 vs 2289696
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 2358
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 8211
  • Bigger battery: 8000 vs 4300 mAh
  • Faster charging: 100W vs 25W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
  • Cheaper at launch: $799 vs $1099

  • Higher performance (97/100 vs 84/100)
  • Better camera (90/100 vs 70/100)
  • Longer battery life (90/100 vs 37/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 vs the Xiaomi 17 Max, the Xiaomi 17 Max scores 16 points higher (88/100 vs 72/100). In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Max leads (97/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Max leads (90/100 vs 70/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Max leads (90/100 vs 37/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 — 54/100, Xiaomi 17 Max — 90/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Max is a bit better (97/100 vs 84/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 81/100. In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Max notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 (90/100 vs 70/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Max significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 (90/100 vs 37/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Max (83/100 vs 40/100).

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7: The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Xiaomi 17 Max: The Xiaomi 17 Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Xiaomi 17 Max
Processor Samsung Exynos 2500 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 2289696 3654776
Geekbench Single 2358 3639
Geekbench Multi 8211 11047
Display 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2640x1080 2608x1200
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4300 mAh 8000 mAh
Charging 25W 100W
Wireless charging 15W 50W
DXOMark (camera) 137 —
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 10 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB
OS Android 16 / One UI 8 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 2600 nits 3500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48 IP68
Dimensions 166.7×75.2×6.5 mm —
Weight 188 g 219 g
Launch price $1099 $799

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Front: 10MP
70
camera

Xiaomi 17 Max

  • Main: 200MP f/1.7
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 32MP
90
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7

  • 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2640x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display

Xiaomi 17 Max

  • 6.9" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2608x1200
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7

  • 4300 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
37
battery

Xiaomi 17 Max

  • 8000 mAh
  • Wired: 100W
  • Wireless: 50W
90
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 and Xiaomi 17 Max, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Samsung Exynos 2500
72/100
2289696 AnTuTu
Xiaomi 17 Max Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
88/100 +37.4%
3654776 AnTuTu

Xiaomi 17 Max leads Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 by 37.4% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7

$1099

Xiaomi 17 Max

$799

Launch price difference: $300. Xiaomi 17 Max was $300 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Max is a bit better (97/100 vs 84/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 81/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Max notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 (90/100 vs 70/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Max significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 (90/100 vs 37/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Max (83/100 vs 40/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 or the Xiaomi 17 Max?

The Xiaomi 17 Max is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 — the overall rating gap is 16 points.

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 and the Xiaomi 17 Max?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 has a MobileRank rating of 72/100, the Xiaomi 17 Max — 88/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 or the Xiaomi 17 Max?

The Xiaomi 17 Max leads on camera score (90/100 vs 70/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 or the Xiaomi 17 Max?

The Xiaomi 17 Max leads on performance (97/100 vs 84/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 over the Xiaomi 17 Max?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Xiaomi 17 Max is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.