Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 vs Vivo X Fold6

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 (2025) runs on the Samsung Exynos 2500, while the Vivo X Fold6 (2026) runs on the MediaTek Dimensity 9500; launch prices were $1099 and $1900. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X Fold6 leads — 88/100 vs 72/100 (a 16-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo X Fold6 has the bigger battery (6900 mAh vs 4300); the main camera is 50 MP vs 200 MP; the Vivo X Fold6 is faster in AnTuTu (3,455,738 vs 2,289,696); the Vivo X Fold6 is thinner (4.3mm vs 6.5mm).

The Vivo X Fold6 is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 — the overall rating gap is 16 points.

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7

Performance 84
Display 81
Camera 70
Battery 37
Portability 83
Value for money 54

Vivo X Fold6

Performance 95
Display 81
Camera 87
Battery 82
Portability 100
Value for money 84

What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 better?

  • Cheaper at launch: $1099 vs $1900

  • Overall rating 72/100

What makes Vivo X Fold6 better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3455738 vs 2289696
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3293 vs 2358
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 10243 vs 8211
  • Bigger battery: 6900 vs 4300 mAh
  • Faster charging: 80W vs 25W
  • Better main camera: 200MP vs 50MP
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W

  • Higher performance (95/100 vs 84/100)
  • Better camera (87/100 vs 70/100)
  • Longer battery life (82/100 vs 37/100)
  • Better portability (100/100 vs 83/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 vs the Vivo X Fold6, the Vivo X Fold6 scores 16 points higher (88/100 vs 72/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (95/100 vs 84/100). In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (87/100 vs 70/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (82/100 vs 37/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 — 54/100, Vivo X Fold6 — 84/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 is a bit better (95/100 vs 84/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 81/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 (87/100 vs 70/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 (82/100 vs 37/100). In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 (100/100 vs 83/100).

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7: The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Vivo X Fold6: The Vivo X Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Vivo X Fold6
Processor Samsung Exynos 2500 MediaTek Dimensity 9500
AnTuTu 2289696 3455738
Geekbench Single 2358 3293
Geekbench Multi 8211 10243
Display 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2640x1080 2480x2200
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4300 mAh 6900 mAh
Charging 25W 80W
Wireless charging 15W 50W
DXOMark (camera) 137 —
Main camera 50 MP 200 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 50 MP
Front camera 10 MP 20 MP
RAM 12GB 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 512GB
OS Android 16 / One UI 8 Android 15
Brightness (peak) 2600 nits 5500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48 IP68
Dimensions 166.7×75.2×6.5 mm 159.7×142.3×4.3 mm
Weight 188 g —
Launch price $1099 $1900

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Front: 10MP
70
camera

Vivo X Fold6

  • Main: 200MP f/1.75
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 50MP
  • Front: 20MP
87
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7

  • 6.9" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2640x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display

Vivo X Fold6

  • 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 2480x2200
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7

  • 4300 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
37
battery

Vivo X Fold6

  • 6900 mAh
  • Wired: 80W
  • Wireless: 50W
82
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 and Vivo X Fold6, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 Samsung Exynos 2500
72/100
2289696 AnTuTu
Vivo X Fold6 MediaTek Dimensity 9500
88/100 +33.7%
3455738 AnTuTu

Vivo X Fold6 leads Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 by 33.7% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7

$1099

Vivo X Fold6

$1900

Launch price difference: $801. Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 was $801 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 is a bit better (95/100 vs 84/100).

display

In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 81/100.

camera

In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 (87/100 vs 70/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 (82/100 vs 37/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Vivo X Fold6 notably outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 (100/100 vs 83/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 or the Vivo X Fold6?

The Vivo X Fold6 is noticeably better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 — the overall rating gap is 16 points.

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 and the Vivo X Fold6?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 has a MobileRank rating of 72/100, the Vivo X Fold6 — 88/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 or the Vivo X Fold6?

The Vivo X Fold6 leads on camera score (87/100 vs 70/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 or the Vivo X Fold6?

The Vivo X Fold6 leads on performance (95/100 vs 84/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 over the Vivo X Fold6?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip7 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Vivo X Fold6 is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.