Samsung Galaxy S9 vs Vivo Y32t
The Samsung Galaxy S9 (2018) runs on the Samsung Exynos 9810, while the Vivo Y32t (2022) runs on the MediaTek Helio P70 (). By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo Y32t leads — 11/100 vs 7/100 (a 4-point difference). Key differences: the Vivo Y32t has the bigger battery (5000 mAh vs 3000); the main camera is 12 MP vs 13 MP; the Samsung Galaxy S9 has NFC for contactless payments, the Vivo Y32t doesn't; the Samsung Galaxy S9 is noticeably lighter (163g vs 179g).
Samsung Galaxy S9
Vivo Y32t
- Lighter: 163g vs 179g
- Better design/ergonomics (96/100 vs 76/100)
- Better value for money (60/100 vs 55/100)
- Bigger battery: 5000 vs 3000 mAh
- Better main camera: 13MP vs 12MP
- Longer battery life (36/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S9 vs the Vivo Y32t, the Vivo Y32t scores 4 points higher (11/100 vs 7/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t leads (36/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100. In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S9 (36/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy S9 notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (96/100 vs 76/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy S9 is a bit better (60/100 vs 55/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S9 | Vivo Y32t | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | Samsung Exynos 9810 | MediaTek Helio P70 () | |
| AnTuTu | 583956 | — | |
| Geekbench Single | 769 | — | |
| Geekbench Multi | 2000 | — | |
| Display | 5.8" AMOLED | 6.5" LCD IPS | |
| Resolution | — | 720x1600 | |
| Refresh rate | 60 Hz | — | |
| Battery | 3000 mAh | 5000 mAh | |
| Charging | — | — | |
| Main camera | 12 MP | 13 MP | |
| Front camera | 8 MP | 8 MP | |
| RAM | 4GB | — | |
| Storage | 64GB / 128GB / 256GB | 128GB / 256GB | |
| OS | — | Android 11 Red Velvet Cake | |
| NFC | yes | no | |
| Protection | IP68 | — | |
| Dimensions | 158.1×73.8×8.5 mm | 164.0×75.2×8.3 mm | |
| Weight | 163 g | 179 g | |
| Price | $720 | — |
Samsung Galaxy S9
- Main: 12MP
- Front: 8MP
Vivo Y32t
- Main: 13MP
- Front: 8MP
Samsung Galaxy S9
- 5.8" AMOLED
- Refresh rate: 60 Hz
Vivo Y32t
- 6.5" LCD IPS
- Resolution: 720x1600
- Refresh rate: —
Samsung Galaxy S9
- 3000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
- 5000 mAh
- No wireless charging
Vivo Y32t
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, both devices are on the same level — 0/100.
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo Y32t significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S9 (36/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, the Samsung Galaxy S9 notably outperforms the Vivo Y32t (96/100 vs 76/100).
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy S9 is a bit better (60/100 vs 55/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S9 or the Vivo Y32t?
The Vivo Y32t edges out the Samsung Galaxy S9 by just 4 points — the two devices are very close in overall level.
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S9 and the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy S9 has a MobileRank rating of 7/100, the Vivo Y32t — 11/100.
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S9 over the Vivo Y32t?
The Samsung Galaxy S9 is a better fit for everyday use. The Vivo Y32t is a better fit for everyday use.