Samsung Galaxy S25 vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra

The Samsung Galaxy S25 (2025) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $799 and $999. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 65/100 (a 24-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 4000); the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,600,724 vs 2,583,039); the Samsung Galaxy S25 is noticeably lighter (162g vs 226g).

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 by 24 points (89/100 vs 65/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy S25

Performance 89
Display 81
Camera 40
Battery 31
Portability 89
Value for money 44

Xiaomi 17 Ultra

Performance 97
Display 89
Camera 93
Battery 80
Portability 40
Value for money 88

What makes Samsung Galaxy S25 better?

  • Lighter: 162g vs 226g
  • Cheaper at launch: $799 vs $999

  • Better portability (89/100 vs 40/100)

What makes Xiaomi 17 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3600724 vs 2583039
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 3050
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 9600
  • Bigger battery: 6000 vs 4000 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 25W
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W

  • Higher performance (97/100 vs 89/100)
  • Better camera (93/100 vs 40/100)
  • Longer battery life (80/100 vs 31/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 81/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S25 vs the Xiaomi 17 Ultra, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra scores 24 points higher (89/100 vs 65/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (80/100 vs 31/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy S25 — 44/100, Xiaomi 17 Ultra — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a bit better (97/100 vs 89/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 81/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 (93/100 vs 40/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 (80/100 vs 31/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (89/100 vs 40/100).

Samsung Galaxy S25: The Samsung Galaxy S25 is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Xiaomi 17 Ultra: The Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy S25 Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Processor Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 2583039 3600724
Geekbench Single 3050 3639
Geekbench Multi 9600 11047
Display 6.2" Dynamic AMOLED 2X 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 2340x1080 3200x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4000 mAh 6000 mAh
Charging 25W 90W
Wireless charging 15W 50W
DXOMark (camera) — 166
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 10 MP 200 MP
Front camera 12 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 128GB / 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 15 / One UI 7 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 2600 nits 3500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP68 IP68
Dimensions 158.4×75.8×7.3 mm 162.9×77.6×8.3 mm
Weight 162 g 226 g
Launch price $799 $999

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy S25

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Telephoto: 10MP
  • Front: 12MP
40
camera

Xiaomi 17 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.63
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
93
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy S25

  • 6.2" Dynamic AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 2340x1080
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
81
display

Xiaomi 17 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 3200x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy S25

  • 4000 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
31
battery

Xiaomi 17 Ultra

  • 6000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 16:09 hrs, total 33:23 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 50W
80
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy S25 and Xiaomi 17 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy S25 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite
65/100
2583039 AnTuTu
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
89/100 +28.3%
3600724 AnTuTu

Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy S25 by 28.3% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy S25

$799

Xiaomi 17 Ultra

$999

Launch price difference: $200. Samsung Galaxy S25 was $200 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a bit better (97/100 vs 89/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 81/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 (93/100 vs 40/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 (80/100 vs 31/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (89/100 vs 40/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S25 or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 by 24 points (89/100 vs 65/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S25 and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 has a MobileRank rating of 65/100, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy S25 or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 40/100).

Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S25 or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads on performance (97/100 vs 89/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S25 over the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy S25 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.