Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 vs Xiaomi 17 Ultra

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (2026) runs on the Exynos 2600, while the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (2026) runs on the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5; launch prices were $1099 and $999. By overall MobileRank rating, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads — 89/100 vs 66/100 (a 23-point difference). Key differences: the Xiaomi 17 Ultra has the bigger battery (6000 mAh vs 4300); the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is faster in AnTuTu (3,600,724 vs 3,113,347); the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 is noticeably lighter (180g vs 226g).

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 by 23 points (89/100 vs 66/100).

Profile comparison

Category scores

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8

Performance 93
Display 80
Camera 35
Battery 37
Portability 80
Value for money 42

Xiaomi 17 Ultra

Performance 97
Display 89
Camera 93
Battery 80
Portability 40
Value for money 88

What makes Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 better?

  • Lighter: 180g vs 226g

  • Better portability (80/100 vs 40/100)

What makes Xiaomi 17 Ultra better?

  • Higher AnTuTu: 3600724 vs 3113347
  • Better Geekbench Single: 3639 vs 3235
  • Better Geekbench Multi: 11047 vs 10904
  • Bigger battery: 6000 vs 4300 mAh
  • Faster charging: 90W vs 25W
  • Faster wireless charging: 50W vs 15W
  • Cheaper at launch: $999 vs $1099

  • Higher performance (97/100 vs 93/100)
  • Better camera (93/100 vs 35/100)
  • Longer battery life (80/100 vs 37/100)
  • Better display (89/100 vs 80/100)

Comparison verdict

Comparing the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 vs the Xiaomi 17 Ultra, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra scores 23 points higher (89/100 vs 66/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (93/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads (80/100 vs 37/100). Value score: Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 — 42/100, Xiaomi 17 Ultra — 88/100; it shows how far a model sits above or below the usual level for its price, and is not part of the overall rating. In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 are nearly equal (97/100 vs 93/100). In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100). In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (93/100 vs 35/100). In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (80/100 vs 37/100). In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (80/100 vs 40/100).

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8: The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 is a better fit for gamers and power users.
Xiaomi 17 Ultra: The Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.

Specs comparison

Specification Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 Xiaomi 17 Ultra
Processor Exynos 2600 Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
AnTuTu 3113347 3600724
Geekbench Single 3235 3639
Geekbench Multi 10904 11047
Display 6.9" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
Resolution 1080x2520 3200x1440
Refresh rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Battery 4300 mAh 6000 mAh
Charging 25W 90W
Wireless charging 15W 50W
DXOMark (camera) — 166
Main camera 50 MP 50 MP
Ultrawide 12 MP 50 MP
Telephoto 0 MP 200 MP
Front camera 10 MP 32 MP
RAM 12GB 12GB / 16GB
Storage 256GB / 512GB 256GB / 512GB / 1TB
OS Android 16 / One UI 8.5 Android 16
Brightness (peak) 2600 nits 3500 nits
NFC yes yes
Protection IP48 IP68
Dimensions — 162.9×77.6×8.3 mm
Weight 180 g 226 g
Launch price $1099 $999

Camera comparison

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8

  • Main: 50MP f/1.8
  • Ultrawide: 12MP
  • Front: 10MP
35
camera

Xiaomi 17 Ultra

  • Main: 50MP f/1.63
  • Ultrawide: 50MP
  • Telephoto: 200MP
  • Front: 32MP
93
camera

Display comparison

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8

  • 6.9" Foldable Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X
  • Resolution: 1080x2520
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
80
display

Xiaomi 17 Ultra

  • 6.8" LTPO AMOLED
  • Resolution: 3200x1440
  • Refresh rate: 120 Hz
89
display

Battery and charging

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8

  • 4300 mAh
  • Wired: 25W
  • Wireless: 15W
37
battery

Xiaomi 17 Ultra

  • 6000 mAh
  • NanoReview test: web browsing 16:09 hrs, total 33:23 hrs
  • Wired: 90W
  • Wireless: 50W
80
battery

Overall performance score

We compared Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 and Xiaomi 17 Ultra, covering their specs and all relevant benchmarks.

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 Exynos 2600
66/100
3113347 AnTuTu
Xiaomi 17 Ultra Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite Gen 5
89/100 +13.5%
3600724 AnTuTu

Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 by 13.5% in our overall performance rating.

Benchmarks

Launch prices and where to check today's

Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8

$1099

Xiaomi 17 Ultra

$999

Launch price difference: $100. Xiaomi 17 Ultra was $100 cheaper at launch.

Detailed category analysis

performance

In the "performance" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra and the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 are nearly equal (97/100 vs 93/100).

display

In the "display" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a bit better (89/100 vs 80/100).

camera

In the "camera" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (93/100 vs 35/100).

battery

In the "battery" category, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 (80/100 vs 37/100).

portability

In the "portability" category, the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 significantly outperforms the Xiaomi 17 Ultra (80/100 vs 40/100).

Frequently asked questions

Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 by 23 points (89/100 vs 66/100).

What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 and the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 has a MobileRank rating of 66/100, the Xiaomi 17 Ultra — 89/100.

Which has the better camera: the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 or the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?

The Xiaomi 17 Ultra leads on camera score (93/100 vs 35/100).

Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 over the Xiaomi 17 Ultra?

The Samsung Galaxy Z Flip8 is a better fit for gamers and power users. The Xiaomi 17 Ultra is a better fit for gamers and power users, mobile photography enthusiasts, those who care about battery life, budget-conscious buyers.