Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim vs Vivo X Fold6
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (2024) and the Vivo X Fold6 (2026) on specs and benchmarks. By overall MobileRank rating, the Vivo X Fold6 leads — 75/100 vs 37/100 (a 38-point difference).
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
Vivo X Fold6
- Better value for money (55/100 vs 0/100)
- Higher performance (77/100 vs 0/100)
- Better camera (85/100 vs 81/100)
- Longer battery life (74/100 vs 0/100)
Comparing the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim vs the Vivo X Fold6, the Vivo X Fold6 scores 38 points higher (75/100 vs 37/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (77/100 vs 0/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 leads (74/100 vs 0/100). In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim leads (55/100 vs 0/100). In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (77/100 vs 0/100). In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100. In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim are nearly equal (85/100 vs 81/100). In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (74/100 vs 0/100). In the "design" category, both devices are on the same level — 50/100. In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Vivo X Fold6 (55/100 vs 0/100).
| Specification | Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim | Vivo X Fold6 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Processor | — | MediaTek Dimensity 9500 | |
| AnTuTu | — | 3485039 | |
| Geekbench Single | — | 3228 | |
| Geekbench Multi | — | 9553 | |
| Display | 6.7" OLED | 8.0" LTPO AMOLED | |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 2480x2200 | |
| Refresh rate | 120 Hz | 120 Hz | |
| Battery | — | 6900 mAh | |
| Charging | — | 80W | |
| Wireless charging | 0W | 50W | |
| Main camera | 200 MP | 200 MP | |
| Ultrawide | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Telephoto | 50 MP | 50 MP | |
| Front camera | 10 MP | 20 MP | |
| RAM | 8GB | 16GB | |
| Storage | 128GB / 256GB / 512GB | 512GB | |
| OS | Android 15, One UI 7 | Android 15 | |
| Brightness (peak) | — | 5500 nits | |
| NFC | yes | yes | |
| Protection | IP68 | IP68 | |
| Dimensions | — | 159.7×142.3×4.3 mm | |
| Weight | — | — | |
| Price | — | $1900 |
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- Main: 200MP
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 10MP
Vivo X Fold6
- Main: 200MP f/f/1.75
- Ultrawide: 50MP
- Telephoto: 50MP
- Front: 20MP
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- 6.7" OLED
- Resolution: 1080x2400
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Vivo X Fold6
- 8.0" LTPO AMOLED
- Resolution: 2480x2200
- Refresh rate: 120 Hz
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
- —
- No wireless charging
Vivo X Fold6
- 6900 mAh
- Wired: 80W
- Wireless: 50W
Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim
Price unknownperformance
In the "performance" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (77/100 vs 0/100).
display
In the "display" category, both devices are on the same level — 100/100.
camera
In the "camera" category, the Vivo X Fold6 and the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim are nearly equal (85/100 vs 81/100).
battery
In the "battery" category, the Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim (74/100 vs 0/100).
design
In the "design" category, both devices are on the same level — 50/100.
value for money
In the "value for money" category, the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim significantly outperforms the Vivo X Fold6 (55/100 vs 0/100).
Which is better: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim or the Vivo X Fold6?
The Vivo X Fold6 significantly outperforms the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim by 38 points (75/100 vs 37/100).
What is the rating of the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim and the Vivo X Fold6?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim has a MobileRank rating of 37/100, the Vivo X Fold6 — 75/100.
Which is more powerful: the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim or the Vivo X Fold6?
The Vivo X Fold6 leads on performance (77/100 vs 0/100).
Should you choose the Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim over the Vivo X Fold6?
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Slim is a better fit for mobile photography enthusiasts. The Vivo X Fold6 is a better fit for active users, mobile photography enthusiasts.